Compare municipalities
Two to six Colorado cities and towns, per resident, against the Colorado median for FY2016. The address bar holds the comparison, so you can share it.
- Kersey
Northern Front Range
Utilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 24.9% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.- Revenue per resident
- $76456% below CO median (224 reporting)
- Higher than 10% of the 224 reporting
- Expenditures per resident
- Withheld
- Tax revenue per resident
- $43538% below CO median (193 reporting)
- Higher than 33% of the 193 reporting
- Debt per resident
- $93813% below CO median (220 reporting)
- Higher than 46% of the 220 reporting
- Ault
Northern Front Range
Utilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 20.0% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.- Revenue per resident
- $1,10737% below CO median (224 reporting)
- Higher than 30% of the 224 reporting
- Expenditures per resident
- $1,05140% below CO median (196 reporting)
- Higher than 24% of the 196 reporting
- Tax revenue per resident
- $27261% below CO median (193 reporting)
- Higher than 20% of the 193 reporting
- Debt per resident
- $57147% below CO median (220 reporting)
- Higher than 32% of the 220 reporting
- Gilcrest
Northern Front Range
- Revenue per resident
- —
- Expenditures per resident
- —
- Tax revenue per resident
- —
- Debt per resident
- —
This column’s city Other compared cities Other Colorado municipalities reporting
This is public data, published once a year.
Orivian runs the same analysis on your own general ledger, every month, with the same source-to-number lineage.