Compare municipalities
Two to six Colorado cities and towns, per resident, against the Colorado median for FY2016. The address bar holds the comparison, so you can share it.
- Revenue per resident
- $2,11121% above CO median (224 reporting)
- Higher than 61% of the 224 reporting
- Expenditures per resident
- $2,04317% above CO median (196 reporting)
- Higher than 59% of the 196 reporting
- Tax revenue per resident
- $1,6792.4× CO median (193 reporting)
- Higher than 87% of the 193 reporting
- Debt per resident
- $1,84772% above CO median (220 reporting)
- Higher than 68% of the 220 reporting
- Eaton
Northern Front Range
Utilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 20.1% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.- Revenue per resident
- $1,04640% below CO median (224 reporting)
- Higher than 27% of the 224 reporting
- Expenditures per resident
- $1,03741% below CO median (196 reporting)
- Higher than 24% of the 196 reporting
- Tax revenue per resident
- $36648% below CO median (193 reporting)
- Higher than 25% of the 193 reporting
- Debt per resident
- $1,074in line with CO median (220 reporting)
- Higher than 50% of the 220 reporting
- Lochbuie
Northern Front Range
Utilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 32.2% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.- Revenue per resident
- $2,00015% above CO median (224 reporting)
- Higher than 57% of the 224 reporting
- Expenditures per resident
- $1,27327% below CO median (196 reporting)
- Higher than 32% of the 196 reporting
- Tax revenue per resident
- $35550% below CO median (193 reporting)
- Higher than 25% of the 193 reporting
- Debt per resident
- $55848% below CO median (220 reporting)
- Higher than 32% of the 220 reporting
- Dacono
Northern Front Range
Utilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 20.3% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.- Revenue per resident
- $1,38721% below CO median (224 reporting)
- Higher than 40% of the 224 reporting
- Expenditures per resident
- $1,35722% below CO median (196 reporting)
- Higher than 35% of the 196 reporting
- Tax revenue per resident
- $80815% above CO median (193 reporting)
- Higher than 58% of the 193 reporting
- Debt per resident
- $60544% below CO median (220 reporting)
- Higher than 34% of the 220 reporting
- Edgewater
Denver Metro
Utilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 23.1% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.- Revenue per resident
- $93347% below CO median (224 reporting)
- Higher than 16% of the 224 reporting
- Expenditures per resident
- Withheld
- Tax revenue per resident
- Withheld
- Debt per resident
- $17584% below CO median (220 reporting)
- Higher than 11% of the 220 reporting
- Woodland Park
Pikes Peak
Utilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 16.3% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.- Revenue per resident
- $2,02516% above CO median (224 reporting)
- Higher than 58% of the 224 reporting
- Expenditures per resident
- $2,57847% above CO median (196 reporting)
- Higher than 67% of the 196 reporting
- Tax revenue per resident
- $1,09055% above CO median (193 reporting)
- Higher than 75% of the 193 reporting
- Debt per resident
- $3,5053.3× CO median (220 reporting)
- Higher than 87% of the 220 reporting
This column’s city Other compared cities Other Colorado municipalities reporting
This is public data, published once a year.
Orivian runs the same analysis on your own general ledger, every month, with the same source-to-number lineage.
