Compare municipalities
Two to six Colorado cities and towns, per resident, against the Colorado median for FY2016. The address bar holds the comparison, so you can share it.
- Mead
Northern Front Range
- Revenue per resident
- $1,14934% below CO median (224 reporting)
- Higher than 31% of the 224 reporting
- Expenditures per resident
- $1,13335% below CO median (196 reporting)
- Higher than 27% of the 196 reporting
- Tax revenue per resident
- $78712% above CO median (193 reporting)
- Higher than 56% of the 193 reporting
- Debt per resident
- $39863% below CO median (220 reporting)
- Higher than 28% of the 220 reporting
- Estes Park
Northern Front Range
Utilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 45.8% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.Regional hub: Sales tax per resident is 3.8× the Colorado median.- Revenue per resident
- $6,6103.8× CO median (224 reporting)
- Higher than 96% of the 224 reporting
- Expenditures per resident
- $7,6414.4× CO median (196 reporting)
- Higher than 95% of the 196 reporting
- Tax revenue per resident
- $2,6873.8× CO median (193 reporting)
- Higher than 95% of the 193 reporting
- Debt per resident
- $2,01288% above CO median (220 reporting)
- Higher than 70% of the 220 reporting
This column’s city Other compared cities Other Colorado municipalities reporting
This is public data, published once a year.
Orivian runs the same analysis on your own general ledger, every month, with the same source-to-number lineage.