Compare municipalities
Two to six Colorado cities and towns, per resident, against the Colorado median for FY2016. The address bar holds the comparison, so you can share it.
- Timnath
Northern Front Range
- Revenue per resident
- $3,6752.1× CO median (224 reporting)
- Higher than 87% of the 224 reporting
- Expenditures per resident
- $2,92567% above CO median (196 reporting)
- Higher than 72% of the 196 reporting
- Tax revenue per resident
- Withheld
- Debt per resident
- $65739% below CO median (220 reporting)
- Higher than 37% of the 220 reporting
- Eaton
Northern Front Range
Utilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 20.1% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.- Revenue per resident
- $1,04640% below CO median (224 reporting)
- Higher than 27% of the 224 reporting
- Expenditures per resident
- $1,03741% below CO median (196 reporting)
- Higher than 24% of the 196 reporting
- Tax revenue per resident
- $36648% below CO median (193 reporting)
- Higher than 25% of the 193 reporting
- Debt per resident
- $1,074in line with CO median (220 reporting)
- Higher than 50% of the 220 reporting
- Mead
Northern Front Range
- Revenue per resident
- $1,14934% below CO median (224 reporting)
- Higher than 31% of the 224 reporting
- Expenditures per resident
- $1,13335% below CO median (196 reporting)
- Higher than 27% of the 196 reporting
- Tax revenue per resident
- $78712% above CO median (193 reporting)
- Higher than 56% of the 193 reporting
- Debt per resident
- $39863% below CO median (220 reporting)
- Higher than 28% of the 220 reporting
This column’s city Other compared cities Other Colorado municipalities reporting
This is public data, published once a year.
Orivian runs the same analysis on your own general ledger, every month, with the same source-to-number lineage.