Orivian

Brush · FY2016 municipal finance benchmarks

Morgan County · Eastern Plains · statutory city · Pop. 5,337 (2025 estimate); FY2016 per-resident figures use 5,380 · Census finance data FY2016, FY2018, FY2019, FY2020, FY2021, FY2022

You’re viewing FY2016. See the latest view (FY2022). Latest Census Bureau finance data for Brush: FY2022. Retrieved Oct 2026. Newer years are added when the Census Bureau publishes them. Why the lag?

FY2016 in brief

Brush collected $1,652 per resident (including city-run utilities), 5% below the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year, 51% below its peers. Tax revenue per resident sits 7% below its peers, and 20% below the state median. Debt per resident runs 30% below peers.

Generated from the figures below. Every number links to its Census source.

Compared with

Nearest on population, household income and region

FY2016 headline figures

Revenue per resident (definition)

$1,652
51% below peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$3,372
CO median · 224 with a published figure
$1,746
Position
Higher than 47% of the 224 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Expenditures per resident (definition)

$1,940
40% below peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$3,242
CO median · 196 with a published figure
$1,749
Position
Higher than 54% of the 196 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Tax revenue per resident (definition)

$564
7% below peers
Peer median
$604
CO median · 193 with a published figure
$705
Position
Higher than 43% of the 193 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Debt per resident (definition)

$1,351
30% below peers
Peer median
$1,926
CO median · 220 with a published figure
$1,072
Position
Higher than 58% of the 220 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Where the money comes from and where it goes

Per resident, FY2016. Bars show Brush; the gold tick is the peer median. How categories work

The biggest difference from peers is Utilities & environment: $977 per resident, 38% below the peer median. On the revenue side, utility & transit charges is 89% below peers.

Money in

Revenue

$1,652
per resident51% below peers
Money in: Brush revenue per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$54837% abovepeers $400
$29937% belowpeers $475
$22774% abovepeers $131
$19089% belowpeers $1,765
$1484.2×peers $35
$12257% abovepeers $78
$11817% abovepeers $101
Peer median of 4 peers · Colorado median of 224 reporting

Money out

Spending

$1,940
per resident40% below peers
Money out: Brush spending per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$97738% belowpeers $1,564
$31115% abovepeers $270
$249in line withpeers $250
$21144% belowpeers $376
$13427% belowpeers $183
$572.2×peers $26
None reported · peers $34$0None reported
Peer median of 4 peers · Colorado median of 196 reporting

Brush and its peers

The five Colorado municipalities nearest on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn’t a matching factor, so peers aren’t chosen on the figures being compared. Per resident, FY2016. How peers are chosen

Open in Compare
Brush compared with its peer municipalities, FY2016, per resident
MunicipalityRevenueExpendituresTax revenueSales taxDebt
BrushUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 11.5% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,652$1,940$564$299$1,351
LamarUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 69.5% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$3,364$3,585$603$482$1,161
BurlingtonUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 53.6% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$2,797$2,386$533$333$1,926
La JuntaUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 60.1% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$3,380$2,898$605$539$2,619
YumaUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 26.1% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$3,818$4,437$679$469$323
Peer median$3,372$3,242$604$475$1,926

Utilities marks a municipality whose revenue and spending include city-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit), which raises its per-resident totals.

Sources

Book a walkthrough