Orivian

Elizabeth · FY2016 municipal finance benchmarks

Elbert County · Eastern Plains · statutory town · Pop. 2,957 (2025 estimate); FY2016 per-resident figures use 1,491 · Census finance data FY2016, FY2018, FY2019, FY2020, FY2021, FY2022

You’re viewing FY2016. See the latest view (FY2022). Latest Census Bureau finance data for Elizabeth: FY2022. Retrieved Oct 2026. Newer years are added when the Census Bureau publishes them. Why the lag?

FY2016 in brief

Elizabeth collected $2,762 per resident (including city-run utilities), 58% above the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year, 13% above its peers. Tax revenue per resident sits 79% above its peers, and 38% above the state median. Debt per resident runs 44% above peers.

Generated from the figures below. Every number links to its Census source.

Compared with

Nearest on population, household income and region

FY2016 headline figures

Revenue per resident (definition)

$2,762
13% above peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$2,440
CO median · 224 with a published figure
$1,746
Position
Higher than 73% of the 224 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Expenditures per resident (definition)

$3,152
44% above peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$2,186
CO median · 196 with a published figure
$1,749
Position
Higher than 75% of the 196 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Tax revenue per resident (definition)

$970
79% above peers
Peer median
$541
CO median · 193 with a published figure
$705
Position
Higher than 69% of the 193 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Debt per resident (definition)

$1,693
44% above peers
Peer median
$1,173
CO median · 220 with a published figure
$1,072
Position
Higher than 67% of the 220 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Where the money comes from and where it goes

Per resident, FY2016. Bars show Elizabeth; the gold tick is the peer median. How categories work

The biggest difference from peers is General government: $453 per resident, 2.8× the peer median. On the revenue side, intergovernmental is 2.8× peers.

Money in

Revenue

$2,762
per resident13% above peers
Money in: Elizabeth revenue per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$61987% abovepeers $331
$5672.8×peers $201
$49233% belowpeers $735
$23813% abovepeers $211
$11516% belowpeers $137
$7852% abovepeers $51
Withheldpeers $298
Peer median of 4 peers · Colorado median of 224 reporting

Money out

Spending

$3,152
per resident44% above peers
Money out: Elizabeth spending per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$682in line withpeers $700
$460No peer comparisonpeers $0
$45448% abovepeers $307
$4532.8×peers $160
$3482.3×peers $149
$29143% abovepeers $203
$25368.5×peers $4
$1093.9×peers $28
$1032.2×peers $47
Peer median of 3 peers · Colorado median of 196 reporting

Elizabeth and its peers

The five Colorado municipalities nearest on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn’t a matching factor, so peers aren’t chosen on the figures being compared. Per resident, FY2016. How peers are chosen

Open in Compare
Elizabeth compared with its peer municipalities, FY2016, per resident
MunicipalityRevenueExpendituresTax revenueSales taxDebt
ElizabethUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 17.8% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$2,762$3,152$970$1,693
JulesburgUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 42.9% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$2,377$298$1,173
AkronUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 14.9% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,332$1,237$714$298$1,153
SpringfieldUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 60.3% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$2,503$2,186$369$232$247
LimonUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 16.6% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$2,711$2,784$832$584$1,868
Peer median$2,440$2,186$541Benchmark unavailable$1,173

Utilities marks a municipality whose revenue and spending include city-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit), which raises its per-resident totals.

Sources

Book a walkthrough