Orivian

Greeley · FY2016 municipal finance benchmarks

Weld County · Northern Front Range · home rule municipality · Pop. 115,073 (2025 estimate); FY2016 per-resident figures use 104,637 · Census finance data FY2016–FY2023

You’re viewing FY2016. See the latest view (FY2023). Latest Census Bureau finance data for Greeley: FY2023. Retrieved Oct 2026. Newer years are added when the Census Bureau publishes them. Why the lag?

FY2016 in brief

Greeley collected $2,037 per resident (including city-run utilities), 17% above the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year, 23% below its peers. Tax revenue per resident sits 11% below its peers, but 35% above the state median. Debt per resident runs 12% above peers.

Generated from the figures below. Every number links to its Census source.

Compared with

Nearest on population, household income and region

FY2016 headline figures

Revenue per resident (definition)

$2,037
23% below peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$2,653
CO median · 224 with a published figure
$1,746
Position
Higher than 58% of the 224 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Expenditures per resident (definition)

$1,978
19% below peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$2,457
CO median · 196 with a published figure
$1,749
Position
Higher than 56% of the 196 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Tax revenue per resident (definition)

$955
11% below peers
Peer median
$1,073
CO median · 193 with a published figure
$705
Position
Higher than 67% of the 193 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Debt per resident (definition)

$1,304
12% above peers
Peer median
$1,161
CO median · 220 with a published figure
$1,072
Position
Higher than 58% of the 220 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Where the money comes from and where it goes

Per resident, FY2016. Bars show Greeley; the gold tick is the peer median. How categories work

The biggest difference from peers is General government: $339 per resident, 35% below the peer median. On the revenue side, utility & transit charges is 61% above peers.

Money in

Revenue

$2,037
per resident23% below peers
Money in: Greeley revenue per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$706in line withpeers $704
$51661% abovepeers $321
$299in line withpeers $301
$1708% belowpeers $186
$15241% belowpeers $258
$11562% belowpeers $305
$7934% belowpeers $120
Peer median of 5 peers · Colorado median of 224 reporting

Money out

Spending

$1,978
per resident19% below peers
Money out: Greeley spending per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$63125% abovepeers $503
$36412% belowpeers $411
$33935% belowpeers $519
$32435% abovepeers $240
$27233% belowpeers $405
$4417% belowpeers $52
$4No peer comparisonpeers $0
$0No peer comparisonpeers $0
Peer median of 5 peers · Colorado median of 196 reporting

Greeley and its peers

The five Colorado municipalities nearest on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn’t a matching factor, so peers aren’t chosen on the figures being compared. Per resident, FY2016. How peers are chosen

Open in Compare
Greeley compared with its peer municipalities, FY2016, per resident
MunicipalityRevenueExpendituresTax revenueSales taxDebt
GreeleyUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 25.3% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$2,037$1,978$955$706$1,304
BoulderUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 6.2% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.Regional hub: Sales tax per resident is 2.2× the Colorado median.$3,546$3,351$1,903$1,211$1,161
LovelandUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 30.2% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$2,653$2,454$1,073$673$32
LongmontUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 31.8% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$2,701$3,226$975$669$2,033
WestminsterUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 13.1% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.Regional hub: Sales tax per resident is 1.6× the Colorado median.$2,451$2,457$1,154$888$2,610
ThorntonUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 12.7% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,721$1,634$903$704$482
Peer median$2,653$2,457$1,073$704$1,161

Utilities marks a municipality whose revenue and spending include city-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit), which raises its per-resident totals.

Regional hub marks a municipality whose sales tax per resident is at least 1.5× the Colorado median: a shopping or visitor hub where people who live elsewhere pay much of the sales tax.

Sources

Book a walkthrough