Orivian

Hotchkiss · FY2016 municipal finance benchmarks

Delta County · Western Slope · statutory town · Pop. 945 (2025 estimate); FY2016 per-resident figures use 893 · Census finance data FY2016, FY2021

You’re viewing FY2016. See the latest view (FY2021). Latest Census Bureau finance data for Hotchkiss: FY2021. Retrieved Oct 2026. Newer years are added when the Census Bureau publishes them. Why the lag?

FY2016 in brief

Hotchkiss collected $1,807 per resident (including city-run utilities), in line with the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year, 24% below its peers. Tax revenue per resident sits 37% below its peers, but 15% above the state median. Debt per resident runs 7% above peers.

Generated from the figures below. Every number links to its Census source.

Compared with

Nearest on population, household income and region

FY2016 headline figures

Revenue per resident (definition)

$1,807
24% below peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$2,373
CO median · 224 with a published figure
$1,746
Position
Higher than 52% of the 224 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Expenditures per resident (definition)

$2,307
32% above CO median
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
Benchmark unavailable
CO median · 196 with a published figure
$1,749
Position
Higher than 62% of the 196 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Tax revenue per resident (definition)

$813
37% below peers
Peer median
$1,290
CO median · 193 with a published figure
$705
Position
Higher than 59% of the 193 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Debt per resident (definition)

$829
7% above peers
Peer median
$775
CO median · 220 with a published figure
$1,072
Position
Higher than 42% of the 220 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Where the money comes from and where it goes

Per resident, FY2016. Bars show Hotchkiss; the gold tick is the peer median. How categories work

On the revenue side, the biggest difference from peers is Property tax: $84 per resident, 73% below the peer median.

Money in

Revenue

$1,807
per resident24% below peers
Money in: Hotchkiss revenue per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$60223% belowpeers $779
$46132% abovepeers $350
$38139% abovepeers $273
$1272.0×peers $62
$11463% belowpeers $309
$8473% belowpeers $317
$3850% belowpeers $77
Peer median of 3 peers · Colorado median of 224 reporting

Money out

Spending

$2,307
per resident
Money out: Hotchkiss spending per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
Peer median unavailable$1,278No peer comparison
Peer median unavailable$683No peer comparison
Peer median unavailable$215No peer comparison
Peer median unavailable$82No peer comparison
Peer median unavailable$37No peer comparison
Peer median unavailable$12No peer comparison
Peer median of 2 peers · Colorado median of 196 reporting

Hotchkiss and its peers

The five Colorado municipalities nearest on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn’t a matching factor, so peers aren’t chosen on the figures being compared. Per resident, FY2016. How peers are chosen

Open in Compare
Hotchkiss compared with its peer municipalities, FY2016, per resident
MunicipalityRevenueExpendituresTax revenueSales taxDebt
HotchkissUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 25.5% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,807$2,307$813$602$829
NuclaUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 50.5% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$806$187$171$190
RidgwayUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 14.8% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$2,373$1,940$1,352$779$775
ParachuteUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 12.3% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.Regional hub: Sales tax per resident is 1.6× the Colorado median.$2,763$2,401$1,290$912$408
Peer median$2,373Benchmark unavailable$1,290$779$775

Utilities marks a municipality whose revenue and spending include city-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit), which raises its per-resident totals.

Regional hub marks a municipality whose sales tax per resident is at least 1.5× the Colorado median: a shopping or visitor hub where people who live elsewhere pay much of the sales tax.

Sources

Book a walkthrough