Orivian

Lamar · FY2016 municipal finance benchmarks

Prowers County · Eastern Plains · home rule municipality · Pop. 7,588 (2025 estimate); FY2016 per-resident figures use 7,551 · Census finance data FY2016, FY2018, FY2019, FY2020, FY2021, FY2022, FY2023

You’re viewing FY2016. See the latest view (FY2023). Latest Census Bureau finance data for Lamar: FY2023. Retrieved Oct 2026. Newer years are added when the Census Bureau publishes them. Why the lag?

FY2016 in brief

Lamar collected $3,364 per resident (including city-run utilities), 93% above the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year, 9% above its peers. Tax revenue per resident sits in line with its peers, but 15% below the state median. Debt per resident runs 40% below peers.

Generated from the figures below. Every number links to its Census source.

Compared with

Nearest on population, household income and region

FY2016 headline figures

Revenue per resident (definition)

$3,364
9% above peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$3,089
CO median · 224 with a published figure
$1,746
Position
Higher than 80% of the 224 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Expenditures per resident (definition)

$3,585
36% above peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$2,642
CO median · 196 with a published figure
$1,749
Position
Higher than 83% of the 196 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Tax revenue per resident (definition)

$603
in line with peers
Peer median
$585
CO median · 193 with a published figure
$705
Position
Higher than 46% of the 193 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Debt per resident (definition)

$1,161
40% below peers
Peer median
$1,926
CO median · 220 with a published figure
$1,072
Position
Higher than 54% of the 220 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Where the money comes from and where it goes

Per resident, FY2016. Bars show Lamar; the gold tick is the peer median. How categories work

The biggest difference from peers is Utilities & environment: $2,143 per resident, 37% above the peer median. On the revenue side, utility & transit charges is 32% above peers.

Money in

Revenue

$3,364
per resident9% above peers
Money in: Lamar revenue per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$2,33832% abovepeers $1,765
$48210% abovepeers $436
$24552% belowpeers $508
$158in line withpeers $165
$9614% belowpeers $112
$2561% belowpeers $64
$2180% belowpeers $104
Peer median of 4 peers · Colorado median of 224 reporting

Money out

Spending

$3,585
per resident36% above peers
Money out: Lamar spending per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$2,14337% abovepeers $1,564
$4852.0×peers $239
$38748% abovepeers $261
$293in line withpeers $306
$17816% abovepeers $153
$68No peer comparisonpeers $0
$3142% belowpeers $54
Peer median of 4 peers · Colorado median of 196 reporting

Lamar and its peers

The five Colorado municipalities nearest on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn’t a matching factor, so peers aren’t chosen on the figures being compared. Per resident, FY2016. How peers are chosen

Open in Compare
Lamar compared with its peer municipalities, FY2016, per resident
MunicipalityRevenueExpendituresTax revenueSales taxDebt
LamarUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 69.5% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$3,364$3,585$603$482$1,161
La JuntaUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 60.1% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$3,380$2,898$605$539$2,619
BrushUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 11.5% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,652$1,940$564$299$1,351
Fort MorganUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 61.8% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$4,784$4,187$795$622$1,417
BurlingtonUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 53.6% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$2,797$2,386$533$333$1,926
Peer median$3,089$2,642$585$436$1,926

Utilities marks a municipality whose revenue and spending include city-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit), which raises its per-resident totals.

Sources

Book a walkthrough