Orivian

Loveland · FY2016 municipal finance benchmarks

Larimer County · Northern Front Range · home rule municipality · Pop. 81,387 (2025 estimate); FY2016 per-resident figures use 79,177 · Census finance data FY2016–FY2023

You’re viewing FY2016. See the latest view (FY2023). Latest Census Bureau finance data for Loveland: FY2023. Retrieved Oct 2026. Newer years are added when the Census Bureau publishes them. Why the lag?

FY2016 in brief

Loveland collected $2,653 per resident (including city-run utilities), 52% above the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year, in line with its peers. Tax revenue per resident sits 7% below its peers, but 52% above the state median. Debt per resident runs 98% below peers.

Generated from the figures below. Every number links to its Census source.

Compared with

Nearest on population, household income and region

FY2016 headline figures

Revenue per resident (definition)

$2,653
in line with peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$2,701
CO median · 224 with a published figure
$1,746
Position
Higher than 71% of the 224 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Expenditures per resident (definition)

$2,454
in line with peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$2,481
CO median · 196 with a published figure
$1,749
Position
Higher than 65% of the 196 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Tax revenue per resident (definition)

$1,073
7% below peers
Peer median
$1,154
CO median · 193 with a published figure
$705
Position
Higher than 74% of the 193 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Debt per resident (definition)

$32
98% below peers
Peer median
$2,033
CO median · 220 with a published figure
$1,072
Position
Higher than 1% of the 220 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Where the money comes from and where it goes

Per resident, FY2016. Bars show Loveland; the gold tick is the peer median. How categories work

The biggest difference from peers is Utilities & environment: $931 per resident, 55% above the peer median. On the revenue side, utility & transit charges is 2.5× peers.

Money in

Revenue

$2,653
per residentin line with peers
Money in: Loveland revenue per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$8012.5×peers $321
$67324% belowpeers $888
$36622% abovepeers $301
$31670% abovepeers $186
$305in line withpeers $292
$10858% belowpeers $258
$8433% belowpeers $126
Peer median of 5 peers · Colorado median of 224 reporting

Money out

Spending

$2,454
per residentin line with peers
Money out: Loveland spending per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$93155% abovepeers $599
$48132% abovepeers $364
$40322% belowpeers $519
$397in line withpeers $405
$24010% belowpeers $267
$396% belowpeers $67
None reported · peers $0$0None reported
Peer median of 5 peers · Colorado median of 196 reporting

Loveland and its peers

The five Colorado municipalities nearest on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn’t a matching factor, so peers aren’t chosen on the figures being compared. Per resident, FY2016. How peers are chosen

Open in Compare
Loveland compared with its peer municipalities, FY2016, per resident
MunicipalityRevenueExpendituresTax revenueSales taxDebt
LovelandUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 30.2% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$2,653$2,454$1,073$673$32
GreeleyUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 25.3% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$2,037$1,978$955$706$1,304
LongmontUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 31.8% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$2,701$3,226$975$669$2,033
BoulderUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 6.2% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.Regional hub: Sales tax per resident is 2.2× the Colorado median.$3,546$3,351$1,903$1,211$1,161
BroomfieldUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 7.8% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.Regional hub: Sales tax per resident is 1.9× the Colorado median.$2,826$2,481$1,926$1,039$3,922
WestminsterUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 13.1% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.Regional hub: Sales tax per resident is 1.6× the Colorado median.$2,451$2,457$1,154$888$2,610
Peer median$2,701$2,481$1,154$888$2,033

Utilities marks a municipality whose revenue and spending include city-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit), which raises its per-resident totals.

Regional hub marks a municipality whose sales tax per resident is at least 1.5× the Colorado median: a shopping or visitor hub where people who live elsewhere pay much of the sales tax.

Sources

Book a walkthrough