Orivian

Marble · FY2016 municipal finance benchmarks

Gunnison County · Central Mountains & Resort · statutory town · Pop. 133 (2025 estimate); FY2016 per-resident figures use 128 · Census finance data FY2016, FY2021

You’re viewing FY2016. See the latest view (FY2021). Latest Census Bureau finance data for Marble: FY2021. Retrieved Oct 2026. Newer years are added when the Census Bureau publishes them. Why the lag?

FY2016 in brief

Marble collected $1,016 per resident (including city-run utilities), 42% below the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year, 8% above its peers. Debt per resident runs 82% below the state median.

  • Tax revenue per resident withheld: Tax revenue per resident is 14% of the peer median

Generated from the figures below. Every number links to its Census source.

Compared with

Nearest on population, household income and region

FY2016 headline figures

Revenue per resident (definition)

$1,016
8% above peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$941
CO median · 224 with a published figure
$1,746
Position
Higher than 26% of the 224 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Expenditures per resident (definition)

$203
88% below CO median
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
Benchmark unavailable
CO median · 196 with a published figure
$1,749
Position
Higher than 2% of the 196 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Tax revenue per resident (definition)

Peer median
Benchmark unavailable
CO median · 193 with a published figure
$705
Position
Not reported for this year
5-year changenominal dollars
Withheld with this year's value

Debt per resident (definition)

$195
82% below CO median
Peer median
Benchmark unavailable
CO median · 220 with a published figure
$1,072
Position
Higher than 20% of the 220 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Where the money comes from and where it goes

Per resident, FY2016. Bars show Marble; the gold tick is the peer median. How categories work

On the revenue side, the biggest difference from peers is Fees & charges: $484 per resident, 11.4× the peer median.

Money in

Revenue

$1,016
per resident8% above peers
Money in: Marble revenue per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$48411.4×peers $42
$2342.3×peers $102
$18063.6×peers $3
None reported · peers $58$0None reported
None reported · peers $3$0None reported
Withheldpeers $514
Peer median of 4 peers · Colorado median of 224 reporting

Money out

Spending

$203
per resident
Money out: Marble spending per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
Peer median unavailable$109No peer comparison
Peer median unavailable$55No peer comparison
Peer median unavailable$23No peer comparison
Peer median unavailable$8No peer comparison
Peer median unavailable$8No peer comparison
None reported$0None reported
Peer median of 2 peers · Colorado median of 196 reporting

Marble and its peers

The five Colorado municipalities nearest on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn’t a matching factor, so peers aren’t chosen on the figures being compared. Per resident, FY2016. How peers are chosen

Open in Compare
Marble compared with its peer municipalities, FY2016, per resident
MunicipalityRevenueExpendituresTax revenueSales taxDebt
MarbleUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 23.1% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,016$203Not reported for this year$195
OphirUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 10.5% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,938$1,249$819Not reported for this year
Silver PlumeUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 23.2% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$955Not reported for this year$182
Montezuma$514$514Not reported for this yearNot reported for this year
Pitkin$928$522$812$449Not reported for this year
Peer median$941Benchmark unavailableBenchmark unavailableNot reported for this yearBenchmark unavailable

Utilities marks a municipality whose revenue and spending include city-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit), which raises its per-resident totals.

Sources

Book a walkthrough