Orivian

Parker · 2016 public safety benchmarks

Douglas County · Denver Metro · Pop. 65,985 (2025 estimate); 2016 per-resident figures use 52,121 · Public safety data 2016–2025

2016 in brief

Parker spent $293 per resident on police in FY2016, 8% above the median of the 179 Colorado municipalities reporting. It had 1.4 sworn officers per 1,000 residents in 2016, 11% below its peers. Reported violent crime was 0.9 per 1,000 residents, 54% below the Colorado median, and property crime was 50% below the median. Police cleared 65.2% of reported violent crimes, 61% above peers.

Generated from the figures below. Every number links to its source.

Compared with

The finance peers: nearest on population, household income and region

Reporting agency: Parker Police Department (ORI CO0180500) · 12 of 12 months reported.

Spending & staffing

Spending: FY2016, the government's fiscal year (Census). Staffing: 2016, sworn officers on the payroll October 31 (FBI).

Police spending per resident (definition)FY2016

$293
9% above peers
Peer median
$268
CO median · 179 with a published figure
$272
Position
Higher than 56% of the 179 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Police share of spending (definition)FY2016

18.6%
34% above peers
Peer median
13.9%
CO median · 153 with a published figure
12.1%
Position
Higher than 75% of the 153 reporting
5-year change
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Police spending per officer (definition)FY2016

$212.3K
30% above peers
Peer median
$163.5K
CO median · 124 with a published figure
$135.2K
Position
Higher than 94% of the 124 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Officers per 1,000 residents (definition)2016

1.4
11% below peers

per 1,000 residents

Peer median
1.6
CO median · 145 with a published figure
2.4
Position
Higher than 11% of the 145 reporting
5-year change
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Reported outcomes

Reported crime reflects what is reported to police and how it is recorded, not only how much crime occurs.

Violent crime rate (definition)2016

0.9
17% below peers

per 1,000 residents

Peer median
1.1
CO median · 126 with a published figure
1.9
Position
Higher than 27% of the 126 reporting
5-year change
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Property crime rate (definition)2016

11.4
53% below peers

per 1,000 residents

Peer median
24.2
CO median · 126 with a published figure
22.9
Position
Higher than 26% of the 126 reporting
5-year change
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Violent crime clearance rate (definition)2016

65.2%
61% above peers
Peer median
40.6%
CO median · 65 with a published figure
50.2%
Position
Higher than 72% of the 65 reporting
5-year change
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Property crime clearance rate (definition)2016

23.3%
39% above peers
Peer median
16.8%
CO median · 113 with a published figure
20.4%
Position
Higher than 61% of the 113 reporting
5-year change
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Parker and its peers

The same five peers as the finance pages. Police spending is per resident for the fiscal year shown; staffing and crime are per 1,000 residents for 2016. How peers are chosen

Parker compared with its peer municipalities: police spending per resident and per-1,000 staffing and crime rates
MunicipalityPolice spendingper resident · FY2016Officers per 1,000 residentsper 1,000 · 2016Violent crimeper 1,000 · 2016Property crimeper 1,000 · 2016Violent crime clearance2016
Parker$2931.40.911.465.2%
Castle Rock$1801.10.814.740.0%
Commerce City$2951.84.533.343.4%
Broomfield$2681.60.524.276.5%
Littleton$2711.61.128.818.8%
Centennial$1971.21.512.840.6%
Peer median$2681.61.124.240.6%

Sources · Retrieved October 12, 2026 from orivian.ai/benchmarks/public-safety

Book a walkthrough