Orivian

Parker · FY2016 municipal finance benchmarks

Douglas County · Denver Metro · home rule municipality · Pop. 65,985 (2025 estimate); FY2016 per-resident figures use 52,121 · Census finance data FY2016, FY2018, FY2019, FY2020, FY2021, FY2022, FY2023

You’re viewing FY2016. See the latest view (FY2023). Latest Census Bureau finance data for Parker: FY2023. Retrieved Oct 2026. Newer years are added when the Census Bureau publishes them. Why the lag?

City website (opens in a new tab)

Compare

FY2016 in brief

Parker collected $1,525 per resident, 13% below the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year, 32% below its peers. Tax revenue per resident sits in line with its peers, but 39% above the state median. Debt per resident runs 20% below peers.

Generated from the figures below. Every number links to its Census source.

Compared with

Nearest on population, household income and region

FY2016 headline figures

Revenue per resident (definition)

$1,525
32% below peers
Peer median
$2,245
CO median · 224 with a published figure
$1,746
Position
Higher than 43% of the 224 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change
How Colorado compares on revenue per resident

Expenditures per resident (definition)

$1,576
18% below peers
Peer median
$1,925
CO median · 196 with a published figure
$1,749
Position
Higher than 45% of the 196 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Tax revenue per resident (definition)

$982
in line with peers
Peer median
$991
CO median · 193 with a published figure
$705
Position
Higher than 70% of the 193 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Debt per resident (definition)

$1,247
20% below peers
Peer median
$1,551
CO median · 220 with a published figure
$1,072
Position
Higher than 56% of the 220 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change
How Colorado compares on debt per resident

How this number was calculated

Revenue per resident · $1,525
Reported by the city to the Census Bureau

  1. 1Metric

    $1,525 Total revenue divided by population

    = Total revenue ÷ population

    Full definition: Revenue per resident

  2. 2Inputs

    Total revenue $79.5M ÷ population 52,121 (2016 estimate)

  3. 3Census line items

    • A61 Parks & recreation charges
    • A80 Sewer charges
    • A89 General government (other) charges
    • B89 Federal aid
    • C30 State aid
    • C46 State aid
    • C89 State aid
    • D46 Local government aid
    • D50 Local government aid
    • D89 Local government aid
    • T01 Property tax
    • T09 General sales tax
    • T15 Selective sales taxes (lodging, utilities, etc.)
    • T19 Selective sales taxes (lodging, utilities, etc.)
    • T20 Licenses & permits
    • T24 Licenses & permits
    • T28 Licenses & permits
    • T29 Licenses & permits
    • U11 Sale of property
    • U20 Interest earnings
    • U30 Fines & forfeits
    • U40 Rents
    • U50 Private donations
    • U99 Miscellaneous

  4. 4Source file

What the numbers mean

  • Parker relies on sales tax more than most Colorado municipalities. Tourism and regional retail can raise sales tax per resident because non-residents pay it.

Where the money comes from and where it goes

Per resident, FY2016. Bars show Parker; the gold tick is the peer median. How categories work

The biggest difference from peers is General government: $186 per resident, 64% below the peer median. On the revenue side, fees & charges is 33% below peers.

Money in

Revenue

$1,525
per resident32% below peers
Money in: Parker revenue per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$8047% abovepeers $753
$24033% belowpeers $357
$17244% abovepeers $119
$14238% abovepeers $103
$13112% belowpeers $150
$3676% belowpeers $149
Peer median of 5 peers · Colorado median of 224 reporting

Money out

Spending

$1,576
per resident18% below peers
Money out: Parker spending per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$5512.2×peers $252
$4292.8×peers $154
$32310% belowpeers $358
$18664% belowpeers $512
$6414% belowpeers $74
$2289% belowpeers $202
Peer median of 5 peers · Colorado median of 196 reporting

Parker and its peers

The five Colorado municipalities nearest on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn’t a matching factor, so peers aren’t chosen on the figures being compared. Per resident, FY2016. How peers are chosen

Open in Compare
Parker compared with its peer municipalities, FY2016, per resident
MunicipalityRevenueExpendituresTax revenueSales taxDebt
Parker$1,525$1,576$982$804$1,247
Castle RockUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 19.4% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$2,292$1,821$940$731$1,551
Commerce CityRegional hub: Sales tax per resident is 1.9× the Colorado median.$1,905$1,925$1,413$1,041$5,874
BroomfieldUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 7.8% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.Regional hub: Sales tax per resident is 1.9× the Colorado median.$2,826$2,481$1,926$1,039$3,922
Littleton$2,245$1,943$991$753$718
Centennial$816$680$578$353$26
Peer median$2,245$1,925$991$753$1,551

Utilities marks a municipality whose revenue and spending include city-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit), which raises its per-resident totals.

Regional hub marks a municipality whose sales tax per resident is at least 1.5× the Colorado median: a shopping or visitor hub where people who live elsewhere pay much of the sales tax.

Trends

Every available fiscal year. Lines break where a year is missing or withheld; nothing is interpolated.

  • This city
  • Peer median
  • Withheld (shown on the axis, no value)
  • Colorado median (Census of Governments years only)
Revenue per resident
FY2016 $1,525 to FY2023 $2,690.$0$1.3K$2.7K’16’18’19’20’21’22’23Peer median FY2016: $2,245Peer median FY2018: $2,488Peer median FY2019: $2,128Peer median FY2020: $2,025Peer median FY2021: $2,433Peer median FY2022: $2,474Peer median FY2023: $2,552Colorado median FY2016: $1,746 (all 224 municipalities reporting)Colorado median FY2021: $2,476 (all 227 municipalities reporting)FY2016: $1,525FY2018: $1,670FY2019: $1,713FY2020: $2,150FY2021: $1,983FY2022: $2,036FY2023: $2,690

Fiscal year · nominal dollars, not adjusted for inflation

Peer group changed in FY2022, FY2023. Peers are matched each year, so the peer median can step when the group changes.

Show data table
Revenue per resident by fiscal year
YearThis cityPeer medianColorado median
FY2016$1,525$2,245$1,746 (224 reporting)
FY2018$1,670$2,488$2,529 (75 reporting, sample year)
FY2019$1,713$2,128$2,694 (73 reporting, sample year)
FY2020$2,150$2,025$2,739 (76 reporting, sample year)
FY2021$1,983$2,433$2,476 (227 reporting)
FY2022$2,036$2,474$3,031 (72 reporting, sample year)
FY2023$2,690$2,552$3,580 (97 reporting, sample year)
Expenditures per resident
FY2016 $1,576 to FY2023 $1,855.$0$1.3K$2.6K’16’18’19’20’21’22’23Peer median FY2016: $1,925Peer median FY2018: $2,028Peer median FY2019: $1,620Peer median FY2020: $1,787Peer median FY2021: $1,998Peer median FY2022: $2,421Peer median FY2023: $2,569Colorado median FY2016: $1,749 (all 224 municipalities reporting)Colorado median FY2021: $2,208 (all 227 municipalities reporting)FY2016: $1,576FY2018: $1,304FY2019: $1,363FY2020: $1,519FY2021: $1,507FY2022: $1,430. Excludes equipment purchases and payments to other governments, which Census stopped reporting after FY2021.FY2023: $1,855. Excludes equipment purchases and payments to other governments, which Census stopped reporting after FY2021.

Fiscal year · nominal dollars, not adjusted for inflation

Census definition change: Excludes equipment purchases and payments to other governments, which Census stopped reporting after FY2021.

Peer group changed in FY2022, the same year as the census definition change. Peers are matched each year, so the peer median can step when the group changes.

Show data table
Expenditures per resident by fiscal year
YearThis cityPeer medianColorado median
FY2016$1,576$1,925$1,749 (196 reporting)
FY2018$1,304$2,028$2,387 (74 reporting, sample year)
FY2019$1,363$1,620$2,759 (71 reporting, sample year)
FY2020$1,519$1,787$2,485 (74 reporting, sample year)
FY2021$1,507$1,998$2,208 (220 reporting)
FY2022$1,430$2,421$3,025 (71 reporting, sample year)
FY2023$1,855$2,569$3,680 (91 reporting, sample year)
Tax revenue per resident
FY2016 $982 to FY2023 $1,626.$0$812.8$1.6K’16’18’19’20’21’22’23Peer median FY2016: $991Peer median FY2018: $1,134Peer median FY2019: $1,046Peer median FY2020: $1,103Peer median FY2021: $1,215Peer median FY2022: $1,338Peer median FY2023: $1,476Colorado median FY2016: $705 (all 224 municipalities reporting)Colorado median FY2021: $1,072 (all 227 municipalities reporting)FY2016: $982FY2018: $1,065FY2019: $1,047FY2020: $1,190FY2021: $1,419FY2022: $1,512FY2023: $1,626

Fiscal year · nominal dollars, not adjusted for inflation

Show data table
Tax revenue per resident by fiscal year
YearThis cityPeer medianColorado median
FY2016$982$991$705 (193 reporting)
FY2018$1,065$1,134$1,173 (70 reporting, sample year)
FY2019$1,047$1,046$1,187 (71 reporting, sample year)
FY2020$1,190$1,103$1,238 (72 reporting, sample year)
FY2021$1,419$1,215$1,072 (201 reporting)
FY2022$1,512$1,338$1,631 (71 reporting, sample year)
FY2023$1,626$1,476$1,726 (90 reporting, sample year)
Debt per resident
FY2016 $1,247 to FY2023 $844.$0$1.1K$2.3K’16’18’19’20’21’22’23Peer median FY2016: $1,551Peer median FY2018: $2,272Peer median FY2019: $835Peer median FY2020: $1,282Peer median FY2021: $1,124Peer median FY2022: $968Peer median FY2023: $847Colorado median FY2016: $1,072 (all 224 municipalities reporting)Colorado median FY2021: $1,411 (all 227 municipalities reporting)FY2016: $1,247FY2018: $1,067FY2019: $839FY2020: $1,110FY2021: $1,010FY2022: $931FY2023: $844

Fiscal year · nominal dollars, not adjusted for inflation

Peer group changed in FY2019, FY2020. Peers are matched each year, so the peer median can step when the group changes.

Show data table
Debt per resident by fiscal year
YearThis cityPeer medianColorado median
FY2016$1,247$1,551$1,072 (220 reporting)
FY2018$1,067$2,272$1,644 (70 reporting, sample year)
FY2019$839$835$1,627 (69 reporting, sample year)
FY2020$1,110$1,282$1,798 (71 reporting, sample year)
FY2021$1,010$1,124$1,411 (199 reporting)
FY2022$931$968$2,068 (73 reporting, sample year)
FY2023$844$847$2,130 (91 reporting, sample year)

Questions about Parker’s finances

How much revenue does Parker collect per resident?
Parker collected $1,525 per resident in FY2016, 13% below the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year. See the figure
How does Parker's spending per resident compare with similar cities?
Parker spent $1,576 per resident in FY2016, 18% below the median of its peers: Castle Rock, Commerce City, Broomfield, Littleton and Centennial. See the figure
How much debt does Parker have per resident?
Parker carried $1,247 of debt per resident in FY2016, 20% below its peers' median. See the figure
Which cities is Parker compared with?
Parker is compared with Castle Rock, Commerce City, Broomfield, Littleton and Centennial: the Colorado municipalities nearest to it on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn't used, so peers aren't chosen on the figures being compared. See the peer table
Where do these numbers come from?
From the U.S. Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, as each government reported its own fiscal year, divided by Census population estimates. Figures that fail quality checks are withheld rather than shown. Sources and methodology

Community context

American Community Survey 5-year estimates and Census population estimates. Where the selected year isn’t available, the nearest earlier year is shown and labeled.

Population growth (5-yr)
+2.4%/yr
2016 estimate
Median household income
Not reported for this year
Poverty rate
Not reported for this year
Median home value
Not reported for this year
Housing vacancy rate
Not reported for this year

Explore further

Also in Denver Metro

Revenue per resident, latest published year.

Sources

Dataset: Parker, CO municipal finance benchmarks

Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (opens in a new tab). Please credit “Source: Orivian Municipal Index, orivian.ai/benchmarks”. See the data use terms.

Notes: dollars are nominal (not inflation-adjusted). Colorado medians cover the municipalities reporting that year. Peers: nearest on population, income and region. Definitions: orivian.ai/benchmarks/methodology.Retrieved October 12, 2026 from orivian.ai/benchmarks.

Every figure on this page is read from the published index; nothing is recalculated for display. Read the methodology

General government is Parker’s largest difference from its peers (64% below the peer median in FY2016). See how that line moves month to month in your own budget-vs-actual.

Orivian applies the same sourced, governed approach to your city's own budget-vs-actual data.

See how it worksTalk to us
Book a walkthrough