Orivian

South Fork · FY2016 municipal finance benchmarks

Rio Grande County · San Luis Valley · statutory town · Pop. 506 (2025 estimate); FY2016 per-resident figures use 430 · Census finance data FY2016, FY2021

You’re viewing FY2016. See the latest view (FY2021). Latest Census Bureau finance data for South Fork: FY2021. Retrieved Oct 2026. Newer years are added when the Census Bureau publishes them. Why the lag?

FY2016 in brief

South Fork collected $1,730 per resident, in line with the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year, 47% below its peers. Tax revenue per resident sits 28% above its peers, and 93% above the state median. Debt per resident runs 94% below peers.

Regional hub: sales tax per resident is 2.2× the Colorado median.

Generated from the figures below. Every number links to its Census source.

Compared with

Nearest on population, household income and region

FY2016 headline figures

Revenue per resident (definition)

$1,730
47% below peers
Peer median
$3,267
CO median · 224 with a published figure
$1,746
Position
Higher than 49% of the 224 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Expenditures per resident (definition)

$1,456
17% below CO median
Peer median
Benchmark unavailable
CO median · 196 with a published figure
$1,749
Position
Higher than 40% of the 196 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Tax revenue per resident (definition)

$1,358
28% above peers
Peer median
$1,059
CO median · 193 with a published figure
$705
Position
Higher than 82% of the 193 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Debt per resident (definition)

$126
94% below peers
Peer median
$1,950
CO median · 220 with a published figure
$1,072
Position
Higher than 5% of the 220 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Where the money comes from and where it goes

Per resident, FY2016. Bars show South Fork; the gold tick is the peer median. How categories work

Regional hub: sales tax per resident is 2.2× the Colorado median.

Sales tax per resident is high, which usually means many non-residents shop, stay or work here. Per-resident figures divide citywide totals by residents only, so they overstate what residents themselves pay and use.

On the revenue side, the biggest difference from peers is Utility & transit charges: none reported, against a peer median of $777 per resident.

Money in

Revenue

$1,730
per resident47% below peers
Money in: South Fork revenue per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$1,23043% abovepeers $861
$27439% abovepeers $197
$12819.4×peers $7
$8845% belowpeers $161
$998% belowpeers $562
None reported · peers $777$0None reported
None reported · peers $187$0None reported
Peer median of 4 peers · Colorado median of 224 reporting

Money out

Spending

$1,456
per resident
Money out: South Fork spending per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
Peer median unavailable$979No peer comparison
Peer median unavailable$298No peer comparison
Peer median unavailable$130No peer comparison
Peer median unavailable$49No peer comparison
None reported$0None reported
None reported$0None reported
None reported$0None reported
Peer median of 2 peers · Colorado median of 196 reporting

South Fork and its peers

The five Colorado municipalities nearest on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn’t a matching factor, so peers aren’t chosen on the figures being compared. Per resident, FY2016. How peers are chosen

Open in Compare
South Fork compared with its peer municipalities, FY2016, per resident
MunicipalityRevenueExpendituresTax revenueSales taxDebt
South ForkRegional hub: Sales tax per resident is 2.2× the Colorado median.$1,730$1,456$1,358$1,230$126
BlancaUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 20.1% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,073$344$171$960
Grand LakeUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 19.2% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.Regional hub: Sales tax per resident is 4.9× the Colorado median.$6,163$5,718$3,643$2,743$883
CreedeUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 18.2% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$3,786$1,078$751$3,320
Lake CityUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 31.5% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.Regional hub: Sales tax per resident is 1.6× the Colorado median.$2,747$1,059$861Not reported for this year
Peer median$3,267Benchmark unavailable$1,059$806$1,950

Utilities marks a municipality whose revenue and spending include city-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit), which raises its per-resident totals.

Regional hub marks a municipality whose sales tax per resident is at least 1.5× the Colorado median: a shopping or visitor hub where people who live elsewhere pay much of the sales tax.

Sources

Book a walkthrough