Compare municipalities
Two to six Colorado cities and towns, per resident, against the Colorado median for FY2016. The address bar holds the comparison, so you can share it.
- Cripple Creek
Pikes Peak
- Revenue per resident
- Withheld
- Expenditures per resident
- $8,7915.0× CO median (196 reporting)
- Higher than 95% of the 196 reporting
- Tax revenue per resident
- Withheld
- Debt per resident
- $96210% below CO median (220 reporting)
- Higher than 47% of the 220 reporting
- Calhan
Pikes Peak
Utilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 45.9% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.- Revenue per resident
- $1,27527% below CO median (224 reporting)
- Higher than 37% of the 224 reporting
- Expenditures per resident
- $1,19432% below CO median (196 reporting)
- Higher than 28% of the 196 reporting
- Tax revenue per resident
- $40443% below CO median (193 reporting)
- Higher than 30% of the 193 reporting
- Debt per resident
- $39064% below CO median (220 reporting)
- Higher than 27% of the 220 reporting
- Pierce
Northern Front Range
Utilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 20.8% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.- Revenue per resident
- $1,739in line with CO median (224 reporting)
- Higher than 50% of the 224 reporting
- Expenditures per resident
- $3,24385% above CO median (196 reporting)
- Higher than 78% of the 196 reporting
- Tax revenue per resident
- $25164% below CO median (193 reporting)
- Higher than 19% of the 193 reporting
- Debt per resident
- $57147% below CO median (220 reporting)
- Higher than 33% of the 220 reporting
- Gilcrest
Northern Front Range
- Revenue per resident
- —
- Expenditures per resident
- —
- Tax revenue per resident
- —
- Debt per resident
- —
- Deer Trail
Denver Metro
Utilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 28.8% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.- Revenue per resident
- $50271% below CO median (224 reporting)
- Higher than 3% of the 224 reporting
- Expenditures per resident
- $27484% below CO median (196 reporting)
- Higher than 3% of the 196 reporting
- Tax revenue per resident
- $9986% below CO median (193 reporting)
- Higher than 4% of the 193 reporting
- Debt per resident
- —
This column’s city Other compared cities Other Colorado municipalities reporting
This is public data, published once a year.
Orivian runs the same analysis on your own general ledger, every month, with the same source-to-number lineage.