Orivian

Craig · FY2016 municipal finance benchmarks

Moffat County · Western Slope · home rule municipality · Pop. 8,874 (2025 estimate); FY2016 per-resident figures use 9,018 · Census finance data FY2016, FY2018, FY2019, FY2020, FY2021, FY2022

You’re viewing FY2016. See the latest view (FY2021). Latest Census Bureau finance data for Craig: FY2022. Retrieved Oct 2026. Newer years are added when the Census Bureau publishes them. Why the lag?

City website (opens in a new tab)

Compare

FY2016 in brief

Craig collected $1,732 per resident (including city-run utilities), in line with the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year, 34% below its peers. Tax revenue per resident sits 37% below its peers, but 9% above the state median. Debt per resident runs 85% below peers.

Generated from the figures below. Every number links to its Census source.

Compared with

Nearest on population, household income and region

FY2016 headline figures

Revenue per resident (definition)

$1,732
34% below peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$2,617
CO median · 224 with a published figure
$1,746
Position
Higher than 49% of the 224 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change
How Colorado compares on revenue per resident

Expenditures per resident (definition)

$1,532
36% below peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$2,402
CO median · 196 with a published figure
$1,749
Position
Higher than 43% of the 196 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Tax revenue per resident (definition)

$768
37% below peers
Peer median
$1,221
CO median · 193 with a published figure
$705
Position
Higher than 55% of the 193 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Debt per resident (definition)

$397
85% below peers
Peer median
$2,709
CO median · 220 with a published figure
$1,072
Position
Higher than 28% of the 220 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change
How Colorado compares on debt per resident

How this number was calculated

Revenue per resident · $1,732
Reported by the city to the Census Bureau

  1. 1Metric

    $1,732 Total revenue divided by population

    = Total revenue ÷ population

    Full definition: Revenue per resident

  2. 2Inputs

    Total revenue $15.6M ÷ population 9,018 (2016 estimate)

  3. 3Census line items

    • A61 Parks & recreation charges
    • A80 Sewer charges
    • A81 Solid waste charges
    • A91 Water utility charges
    • B89 Federal aid
    • C30 State aid
    • C46 State aid
    • C89 State aid
    • C91 State aid
    • T01 Property tax
    • T09 General sales tax
    • T15 Selective sales taxes (lodging, utilities, etc.)
    • T20 Licenses & permits
    • T29 Licenses & permits
    • U20 Interest earnings
    • U30 Fines & forfeits
    • U40 Rents
    • U50 Private donations
    • U99 Miscellaneous

  4. 4Source file

What the numbers mean

  • Craig runs city-owned utilities, which add 20.6% of its revenue. Cities that don't run utilities will look lower on revenue and spending per resident for that reason alone. What counts as utility revenue

Where the money comes from and where it goes

Per resident, FY2016. Bars show Craig; the gold tick is the peer median. How categories work

The biggest difference from peers is General government: $164 per resident, 67% below the peer median. On the revenue side, sales tax is 47% below peers.

Money in

Revenue

$1,732
per resident34% below peers
Money in: Craig revenue per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$55547% belowpeers $1,051
$3696% belowpeers $391
$35614% abovepeers $312
$19017% belowpeers $228
$16887% abovepeers $90
$5077% belowpeers $218
$4427% belowpeers $61
Peer median of 5 peers · Colorado median of 224 reporting

Money out

Spending

$1,532
per resident36% below peers
Money out: Craig spending per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$53411% belowpeers $599
$3839% abovepeers $353
$26040% abovepeers $186
$17658% belowpeers $421
$16467% belowpeers $503
$1091% belowpeers $109
$4No peer comparisonpeers $0
None reported · peers $8$0None reported
Peer median of 5 peers · Colorado median of 196 reporting

Craig and its peers

The five Colorado municipalities nearest on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn’t a matching factor, so peers aren’t chosen on the figures being compared. Per resident, FY2016. How peers are chosen

Open in Compare
Craig compared with its peer municipalities, FY2016, per resident
MunicipalityRevenueExpendituresTax revenueSales taxDebt
CraigUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 20.6% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,732$1,532$768$555$397
DeltaUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 45.9% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,995$2,079$641$606$3,091
RifleUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 11.9% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.Regional hub: Sales tax per resident is 1.9× the Colorado median.$2,617$2,402$1,221$1,051Not reported for this year
Glenwood SpringsUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 27.3% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.Regional hub: Sales tax per resident is 3.2× the Colorado median.$4,750$6,209$2,120$1,775$4,122
CortezUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 8.6% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.Regional hub: Sales tax per resident is 2.5× the Colorado median.$2,943$2,623$1,501$1,387$871
Fruita$1,107$994$373$245$2,327
Peer median$2,617$2,402$1,221$1,051$2,709

Utilities marks a municipality whose revenue and spending include city-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit), which raises its per-resident totals.

Regional hub marks a municipality whose sales tax per resident is at least 1.5× the Colorado median: a shopping or visitor hub where people who live elsewhere pay much of the sales tax.

Trends

Every available fiscal year. Lines break where a year is missing or withheld; nothing is interpolated.

  • This city
  • Peer median
  • Withheld (shown on the axis, no value)
  • Colorado median (Census of Governments years only)
Revenue per resident
FY2016 $1,732 to FY2021 $2,577. 1 year withheld.$0$1.4K$2.7K’16’18’19’20’21’22Peer median FY2016: $2,617Peer median FY2018: $2,127Peer median FY2019: $2,218Peer median FY2020: $2,146Peer median FY2021: $2,726Colorado median FY2016: $1,746 (all 224 municipalities reporting)Colorado median FY2021: $2,476 (all 227 municipalities reporting)FY2016: $1,732FY2018: $1,961FY2019: $2,065FY2020: $2,377FY2021: $2,577FY2022: withheld — Revenue per resident is 7% of this city's typical level in other years

Fiscal year · nominal dollars, not adjusted for inflation

  • FY2022 withheld: Revenue per resident is 7% of this city's typical level in other years

Peer group changed in FY2021, FY2022. Peers are matched each year, so the peer median can step when the group changes.

Show data table
Revenue per resident by fiscal year
YearThis cityPeer medianColorado median
FY2016$1,732$2,617$1,746 (224 reporting)
FY2018$1,961$2,127$2,529 (75 reporting, sample year)
FY2019$2,065$2,218$2,694 (73 reporting, sample year)
FY2020$2,377$2,146$2,739 (76 reporting, sample year)
FY2021$2,577$2,726$2,476 (227 reporting)
FY2022Withheld (Revenue per resident is 7% of this city's typical level in other years)Benchmark unavailable$3,031 (72 reporting, sample year)
Expenditures per resident
FY2016 $1,532 to FY2021 $2,384. 1 year withheld.$0$1.2K$2.4K’16’18’19’20’21’22Peer median FY2016: $2,402Peer median FY2018: $2,072Peer median FY2019: $2,120Peer median FY2020: $1,992Peer median FY2021: $2,370Colorado median FY2016: $1,749 (all 224 municipalities reporting)Colorado median FY2021: $2,208 (all 227 municipalities reporting)FY2016: $1,532FY2018: $1,698FY2019: $1,812FY2020: $1,957FY2021: $2,384FY2022: withheld — Expenditures per resident is 1% of this city's typical level in other years

Fiscal year · nominal dollars, not adjusted for inflation

Census definition change: Excludes equipment purchases and payments to other governments, which Census stopped reporting after FY2021.

  • FY2022 withheld: Expenditures per resident is 1% of this city's typical level in other years

Peer group changed in FY2020, FY2021, FY2022, the same year as the census definition change. Peers are matched each year, so the peer median can step when the group changes.

Show data table
Expenditures per resident by fiscal year
YearThis cityPeer medianColorado median
FY2016$1,532$2,402$1,749 (196 reporting)
FY2018$1,698$2,072$2,387 (74 reporting, sample year)
FY2019$1,812$2,120$2,759 (71 reporting, sample year)
FY2020$1,957$1,992$2,485 (74 reporting, sample year)
FY2021$2,384$2,370$2,208 (220 reporting)
FY2022Withheld (Expenditures per resident is 1% of this city's typical level in other years)Benchmark unavailable$3,025 (71 reporting, sample year)
Tax revenue per resident
FY2016 $768 to FY2021 $1,386. 1 year withheld.$0$736$1.5K’16’18’19’20’21’22Peer median FY2016: $1,221Peer median FY2018: $1,173Peer median FY2019: $1,251Peer median FY2020: $1,031Peer median FY2021: $1,472Colorado median FY2016: $705 (all 224 municipalities reporting)Colorado median FY2021: $1,072 (all 227 municipalities reporting)FY2016: $768FY2018: $951FY2019: $1,057FY2020: $1,212FY2021: $1,386FY2022: withheld — Tax revenue per resident is 14% of this city's typical level in other years

Fiscal year · nominal dollars, not adjusted for inflation

  • FY2022 withheld: Tax revenue per resident is 14% of this city's typical level in other years

Peer group changed in FY2021, FY2022. Peers are matched each year, so the peer median can step when the group changes.

Show data table
Tax revenue per resident by fiscal year
YearThis cityPeer medianColorado median
FY2016$768$1,221$705 (193 reporting)
FY2018$951$1,173$1,173 (70 reporting, sample year)
FY2019$1,057$1,251$1,187 (71 reporting, sample year)
FY2020$1,212$1,031$1,238 (72 reporting, sample year)
FY2021$1,386$1,472$1,072 (201 reporting)
FY2022Withheld (Tax revenue per resident is 14% of this city's typical level in other years)Benchmark unavailable$1,631 (71 reporting, sample year)
Debt per resident
FY2016 $397 to FY2022 $611.$0$1.4K$2.8K’16’18’19’20’21’22Peer median FY2016: $2,709Peer median FY2018: $2,834Peer median FY2019: $2,007Peer median FY2020: $2,201Peer median FY2021: $2,066Peer median FY2022: $2,168Colorado median FY2016: $1,072 (all 224 municipalities reporting)Colorado median FY2021: $1,411 (all 227 municipalities reporting)FY2016: $397FY2018: $341FY2019: $662FY2020: $624FY2021: $665FY2022: $611

Fiscal year · nominal dollars, not adjusted for inflation

Peer group changed in FY2018, FY2021, FY2022. Peers are matched each year, so the peer median can step when the group changes.

Show data table
Debt per resident by fiscal year
YearThis cityPeer medianColorado median
FY2016$397$2,709$1,072 (220 reporting)
FY2018$341$2,834$1,644 (70 reporting, sample year)
FY2019$662$2,007$1,627 (69 reporting, sample year)
FY2020$624$2,201$1,798 (71 reporting, sample year)
FY2021$665$2,066$1,411 (199 reporting)
FY2022$611$2,168$2,068 (73 reporting, sample year)

Questions about Craig’s finances

How much revenue does Craig collect per resident?
Craig collected $1,732 per resident in FY2016, in line with the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year. See the figure
How does Craig's spending per resident compare with similar cities?
Craig spent $1,532 per resident in FY2016, 36% below the median of its peers: Delta, Rifle, Glenwood Springs, Cortez and Fruita. See the figure
How much debt does Craig have per resident?
Craig carried $397 of debt per resident in FY2016, 85% below its peers' median. See the figure
Which cities is Craig compared with?
Craig is compared with Delta, Rifle, Glenwood Springs, Cortez and Fruita: the Colorado municipalities nearest to it on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn't used, so peers aren't chosen on the figures being compared. See the peer table
Where do these numbers come from?
From the U.S. Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, as each government reported its own fiscal year, divided by Census population estimates. Figures that fail quality checks are withheld rather than shown. Sources and methodology

Community context

American Community Survey 5-year estimates and Census population estimates. Where the selected year isn’t available, the nearest earlier year is shown and labeled.

Population growth (5-yr)
−0.4%/yr
2016 estimate
Median household income
Not reported for this year
Poverty rate
Not reported for this year
Median home value
Not reported for this year
Housing vacancy rate
Not reported for this year

Explore further

Also in Western Slope

Revenue per resident, latest published year.

Sources

Dataset: Craig, CO municipal finance benchmarks

Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (opens in a new tab). Please credit “Source: Orivian Municipal Index, orivian.ai/benchmarks”. See the data use terms.

Notes: dollars are nominal (not inflation-adjusted). Colorado medians cover the municipalities reporting that year. Peers: nearest on population, income and region. Definitions: orivian.ai/benchmarks/methodology.Retrieved October 12, 2026 from orivian.ai/benchmarks.

Every figure on this page is read from the published index; nothing is recalculated for display. Read the methodology

General government is Craig’s largest difference from its peers (67% below the peer median in FY2016). See how that line moves month to month in your own budget-vs-actual.

Orivian applies the same sourced, governed approach to your city's own budget-vs-actual data.

See how it worksTalk to us
Book a walkthrough