Orivian

Estes Park · FY2016 municipal finance benchmarks

Larimer County · Northern Front Range · statutory town · Pop. 5,780 (2025 estimate); FY2016 per-resident figures use 6,384 · Census finance data FY2016–FY2023

You’re viewing FY2016. See the latest view (FY2023). Latest Census Bureau finance data for Estes Park: FY2023. Retrieved Oct 2026. Newer years are added when the Census Bureau publishes them. Why the lag?

FY2016 in brief

Estes Park collected $6,610 per resident (including city-run utilities), 3.8× the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year, 3.3× its peers. Tax revenue per resident sits 5.0× its peers, and 3.8× the state median. Debt per resident runs 3.3× peers.

Regional hub: sales tax per resident is 3.8× the Colorado median.

Generated from the figures below. Every number links to its Census source.

Compared with

Nearest on population, household income and region

FY2016 headline figures

Revenue per resident (definition)

$6,610
3.3× peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$2,000
CO median · 224 with a published figure
$1,746
Position
Higher than 96% of the 224 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Expenditures per resident (definition)

$7,641
5.6× peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$1,357
CO median · 196 with a published figure
$1,749
Position
Higher than 95% of the 196 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Tax revenue per resident (definition)

$2,687
5.0× peers
Peer median
$536
CO median · 193 with a published figure
$705
Position
Higher than 95% of the 193 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Debt per resident (definition)

$2,012
3.3× peers
Peer median
$605
CO median · 220 with a published figure
$1,072
Position
Higher than 70% of the 220 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Where the money comes from and where it goes

Per resident, FY2016. Bars show Estes Park; the gold tick is the peer median. How categories work

Regional hub: sales tax per resident is 3.8× the Colorado median.

Sales tax per resident is high, which usually means many non-residents shop, stay or work here. Per-resident figures divide citywide totals by residents only, so they overstate what residents themselves pay and use.

The biggest difference from peers is Utilities & environment: $2,875 per resident, 4.8× the peer median. On the revenue side, utility & transit charges is 8.4× peers.

Money in

Revenue

$6,610
per resident3.3× peers
Money in: Estes Park revenue per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$3,0308.4×peers $359
$2,0885.7×peers $363
$5428.5×peers $64
$5303.4×peers $155
$29866% abovepeers $180
$6483% belowpeers $389
$5782% belowpeers $307
Peer median of 5 peers · Colorado median of 224 reporting

Money out

Spending

$7,641
per resident5.6× peers
Money out: Estes Park spending per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$2,8754.8×peers $599
$1,6475.7×peers $288
$1,2027.7×peers $156
$98625.9×peers $38
$8654.2×peers $208
$673.7×peers $18
Peer median of 5 peers · Colorado median of 196 reporting

Estes Park and its peers

The five Colorado municipalities nearest on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn’t a matching factor, so peers aren’t chosen on the figures being compared. Per resident, FY2016. How peers are chosen

Open in Compare
Estes Park compared with its peer municipalities, FY2016, per resident
MunicipalityRevenueExpendituresTax revenueSales taxDebt
Estes ParkUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 45.8% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.Regional hub: Sales tax per resident is 3.8× the Colorado median.$6,610$7,641$2,687$2,088$2,012
DaconoUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 20.3% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,387$1,357$808$363$605
BerthoudUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 9.6% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$3,154$2,895$524$375$168
LochbuieUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 32.2% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$2,000$1,273$355$219$558
Fort LuptonUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 22.7% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$2,287$1,868$960$526$2,000
MillikenUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 32.3% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,113$943$536$186$811
Peer median$2,000$1,357$536$363$605

Utilities marks a municipality whose revenue and spending include city-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit), which raises its per-resident totals.

Regional hub marks a municipality whose sales tax per resident is at least 1.5× the Colorado median: a shopping or visitor hub where people who live elsewhere pay much of the sales tax.

Sources

Book a walkthrough