Orivian

Fort Lupton · FY2016 municipal finance benchmarks

Weld County · Northern Front Range · statutory city · Pop. 10,402 (2025 estimate); FY2016 per-resident figures use 8,369 · Census finance data FY2016, FY2021, FY2023

You’re viewing FY2016. See the latest view (FY2023). Latest Census Bureau finance data for Fort Lupton: FY2023. Retrieved Oct 2026. Newer years are added when the Census Bureau publishes them. Why the lag?

FY2016 in brief

Fort Lupton collected $2,287 per resident (including city-run utilities), 31% above the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year, 65% above its peers. Tax revenue per resident sits 43% above its peers. Debt per resident runs 3.3× peers.

Generated from the figures below. Every number links to its Census source.

Compared with

Nearest on population, household income and region

FY2016 headline figures

Revenue per resident (definition)

$2,287
65% above peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$1,387
CO median · 224 with a published figure
$1,746
Position
Higher than 65% of the 224 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Expenditures per resident (definition)

$1,868
12% below peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$2,126
CO median · 196 with a published figure
$1,749
Position
Higher than 53% of the 196 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Tax revenue per resident (definition)

$960
43% above peers
Peer median
$672
CO median · 193 with a published figure
$705
Position
Higher than 67% of the 193 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Debt per resident (definition)

$2,000
3.3× peers
Peer median
$605
CO median · 220 with a published figure
$1,072
Position
Higher than 70% of the 220 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Where the money comes from and where it goes

Per resident, FY2016. Bars show Fort Lupton; the gold tick is the peer median. How categories work

The biggest difference from peers is Utilities & environment: $406 per resident, 73% below the peer median. On the revenue side, utility & transit charges is 71% above peers.

Money in

Revenue

$2,287
per resident65% above peers
Money in: Fort Lupton revenue per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$52645% abovepeers $363
$51971% abovepeers $304
$42498% abovepeers $214
$37178% abovepeers $208
$2032.9×peers $71
$18112% belowpeers $206
$6457% abovepeers $41
Peer median of 5 peers · Colorado median of 224 reporting

Money out

Spending

$1,868
per resident12% below peers
Money out: Fort Lupton spending per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$5602.1×peers $272
$40673% belowpeers $1,518
$37027% abovepeers $290
$2603.6×peers $71
$208in line withpeers $207
$482.7×peers $18
$16No peer comparisonpeers $0
$1No peer comparisonpeers $0
Peer median of 4 peers · Colorado median of 196 reporting

Fort Lupton and its peers

The five Colorado municipalities nearest on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn’t a matching factor, so peers aren’t chosen on the figures being compared. Per resident, FY2016. How peers are chosen

Open in Compare
Fort Lupton compared with its peer municipalities, FY2016, per resident
MunicipalityRevenueExpendituresTax revenueSales taxDebt
Fort LuptonUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 22.7% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$2,287$1,868$960$526$2,000
Estes ParkUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 45.8% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.Regional hub: Sales tax per resident is 3.8× the Colorado median.$6,610$7,641$2,687$2,088$2,012
WellingtonUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 23.2% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,178Not reported for this year$221
BerthoudUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 9.6% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$3,154$2,895$524$375$168
MillikenUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 32.3% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,113$943$536$186$811
DaconoUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 20.3% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,387$1,357$808$363$605
Peer median$1,387$2,126$672$369$605

Utilities marks a municipality whose revenue and spending include city-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit), which raises its per-resident totals.

Regional hub marks a municipality whose sales tax per resident is at least 1.5× the Colorado median: a shopping or visitor hub where people who live elsewhere pay much of the sales tax.

Sources

Book a walkthrough