Orivian

Fowler · FY2016 municipal finance benchmarks

Otero County · Eastern Plains · statutory town · Pop. 1,171 (2025 estimate); FY2016 per-resident figures use 1,149 · Census finance data FY2016, FY2021

Latest Census Bureau finance data for Fowler: FY2021. Retrieved Oct 2026. Newer years are added when the Census Bureau publishes them. Why the lag?

FY2016 in brief

Fowler collected $946 per resident (including city-run utilities), 46% below the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year. Tax revenue per resident sits 15% above its peers, but 51% below the state median.

Generated from the figures below. Every number links to its Census source.

Compared with

Nearest on population, household income and region

FY2016 headline figures

Revenue per resident (definition)

$946
44% below peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$1,693
CO median · 224 with a published figure
$1,746
Position
Higher than 19% of the 224 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Expenditures per resident (definition)

$1,196
32% below CO median
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
Benchmark unavailable
CO median · 196 with a published figure
$1,749
Position
Higher than 28% of the 196 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Tax revenue per resident (definition)

$344
15% above peers
Peer median
$298
CO median · 193 with a published figure
$705
Position
Higher than 23% of the 193 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Where the money comes from and where it goes

Per resident, FY2016. Bars show Fowler; the gold tick is the peer median. How categories work

On the revenue side, the biggest difference from peers is Utility & transit charges: $288 per resident, 61% below the peer median.

Money in

Revenue

$946
per resident44% below peers
Money in: Fowler revenue per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$28861% belowpeers $734
$23321% belowpeers $296
$20585% abovepeers $111
$7335% belowpeers $113
$6588% abovepeers $35
$4371% belowpeers $148
$3852% belowpeers $80
Peer median of 4 peers · Colorado median of 224 reporting

Money out

Spending

$1,196
per resident
Money out: Fowler spending per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
Peer median unavailable$477No peer comparison
Peer median unavailable$211No peer comparison
Peer median unavailable$199No peer comparison
Peer median unavailable$188No peer comparison
Peer median unavailable$120No peer comparison
None reported$0None reported
None reported$0None reported
None reported$0None reported
Peer median of 2 peers · Colorado median of 196 reporting

Fowler and its peers

The five Colorado municipalities nearest on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn’t a matching factor, so peers aren’t chosen on the figures being compared. Per resident, FY2016. How peers are chosen

Open in Compare
Fowler compared with its peer municipalities, FY2016, per resident
MunicipalityRevenueExpendituresTax revenueSales taxDebt
FowlerUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 30.5% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$946$1,196$344$205Not reported for this year
SpringfieldUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 60.3% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$2,503$2,186$369$232$247
OrdwayUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 23.2% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$927Not reported for this year$174
JulesburgUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 42.9% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$2,377$298$1,173
Log Lane VillageUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 44.6% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,008$270$111Not reported for this year
Peer median$1,693Benchmark unavailable$298Benchmark unavailableNot reported for this year

Utilities marks a municipality whose revenue and spending include city-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit), which raises its per-resident totals.

Sources

Book a walkthrough