Orivian

Pritchett · FY2016 municipal finance benchmarks

Baca County · Eastern Plains · statutory town · Pop. 106 (2025 estimate); FY2016 per-resident figures use 130 · Census finance data FY2016, FY2018, FY2019, FY2020, FY2021, FY2022

You’re viewing FY2016. See the latest view (FY2022). Latest Census Bureau finance data for Pritchett: FY2022. Retrieved Oct 2026. Newer years are added when the Census Bureau publishes them. Why the lag?

FY2016 in brief

Pritchett collected $1,231 per resident (including city-run utilities), 30% below the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year, 13% above its peers. Tax revenue per resident sits 72% below the state median. Debt per resident runs 3.8× peers.

Generated from the figures below. Every number links to its Census source.

Compared with

Nearest on population, household income and region

FY2016 headline figures

Revenue per resident (definition)

$1,231
13% above peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$1,092
CO median · 224 with a published figure
$1,746
Position
Higher than 35% of the 224 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Expenditures per resident (definition)

$746
51% below peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$1,519
CO median · 196 with a published figure
$1,749
Position
Higher than 14% of the 196 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Tax revenue per resident (definition)

$200
72% below CO median
Peer median
Benchmark unavailable
CO median · 193 with a published figure
$705
Position
Higher than 16% of the 193 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Debt per resident (definition)

$2,377
3.8× peers
Peer median
$623
CO median · 220 with a published figure
$1,072
Position
Higher than 74% of the 220 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Where the money comes from and where it goes

Per resident, FY2016. Bars show Pritchett; the gold tick is the peer median. How categories work

The biggest difference from peers is General government: $8 per resident, 98% below the peer median. On the revenue side, intergovernmental is 70% above peers.

Money in

Revenue

$1,231
per resident13% above peers
Money in: Pritchett revenue per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$63870% abovepeers $376
$30812% abovepeers $274
Peer median unavailable$138No peer comparison
$8569% belowpeers $275
$62No peer comparisonpeers $0
None reported · peers $151$0None reported
Peer median of 5 peers · Colorado median of 224 reporting

Money out

Spending

$746
per resident51% below peers
Money out: Pritchett spending per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$60826% abovepeers $483
$77No peer comparisonpeers $0
$3832% belowpeers $57
$15No peer comparisonpeers $0
$898% belowpeers $472
None reported · peers $292$0None reported
None reported · peers $151$0None reported
Peer median of 3 peers · Colorado median of 196 reporting

Pritchett and its peers

The five Colorado municipalities nearest on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn’t a matching factor, so peers aren’t chosen on the figures being compared. Per resident, FY2016. How peers are chosen

Open in Compare
Pritchett compared with its peer municipalities, FY2016, per resident
MunicipalityRevenueExpendituresTax revenueSales taxDebt
PritchettUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 25.0% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,231$746$200Not reported for this year$2,377
CrookUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 22.7% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,092$1,009$193Not reported for this yearNot reported for this year
GenoaUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 23.2% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$958$111Not reported for this year$181
VonaUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 53.4% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$689Not reported for this year$623
SedgwickUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 25.8% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.Regional hub: Sales tax per resident is 1.6× the Colorado median.$3,218$2,810$918Not reported for this year
VilasUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 16.2% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,689$1,519$255$3,415
Peer median$1,092$1,519Benchmark unavailableNot reported for this year$623

Utilities marks a municipality whose revenue and spending include city-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit), which raises its per-resident totals.

Regional hub marks a municipality whose sales tax per resident is at least 1.5× the Colorado median: a shopping or visitor hub where people who live elsewhere pay much of the sales tax.

Sources

Book a walkthrough