Orivian

Sheridan Lake · FY2016 municipal finance benchmarks

Kiowa County · Eastern Plains · statutory town · Pop. 56 (2025 estimate); FY2016 per-resident figures use 81 · Census finance data FY2016, FY2021

You’re viewing FY2016. See the latest view (FY2021). Latest Census Bureau finance data for Sheridan Lake: FY2021. Retrieved Oct 2026. Newer years are added when the Census Bureau publishes them. Why the lag?

FY2016 in brief

Sheridan Lake collected $1,012 per resident (including city-run utilities), 42% below the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year, 24% above its peers. Tax revenue per resident sits 84% below the state median. Debt per resident runs 68% below peers.

Generated from the figures below. Every number links to its Census source.

Compared with

Nearest on population, household income and region

FY2016 headline figures

Revenue per resident (definition)

$1,012
24% above peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$819
CO median · 224 with a published figure
$1,746
Position
Higher than 26% of the 224 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Expenditures per resident (definition)

$222
85% below peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$1,519
CO median · 196 with a published figure
$1,749
Position
Higher than 2% of the 196 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Tax revenue per resident (definition)

$111
84% below CO median
Peer median
Benchmark unavailable
CO median · 193 with a published figure
$705
Position
Higher than 9% of the 193 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Debt per resident (definition)

$185
68% below peers
Peer median
$587
CO median · 220 with a published figure
$1,072
Position
Higher than 17% of the 220 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Where the money comes from and where it goes

Per resident, FY2016. Bars show Sheridan Lake; the gold tick is the peer median. How categories work

The biggest difference from peers is Utilities & environment: $37 per resident, 90% below the peer median. On the revenue side, fees & charges is 62% above peers.

Money in

Revenue

$1,012
per resident24% above peers
Money in: Sheridan Lake revenue per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$48162% abovepeers $297
$23527% belowpeers $321
$1852.2×peers $85
Peer median unavailable$111No peer comparison
None reported · peers $107$0None reported
Peer median of 4 peers · Colorado median of 224 reporting

Money out

Spending

$222
per resident85% below peers
Money out: Sheridan Lake spending per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$9968% belowpeers $307
$624.1×peers $15
$3790% belowpeers $387
$1259% belowpeers $30
$12No peer comparisonpeers $0
None reported · peers $292$0None reported
Peer median of 3 peers · Colorado median of 196 reporting

Sheridan Lake and its peers

The five Colorado municipalities nearest on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn’t a matching factor, so peers aren’t chosen on the figures being compared. Per resident, FY2016. How peers are chosen

Open in Compare
Sheridan Lake compared with its peer municipalities, FY2016, per resident
MunicipalityRevenueExpendituresTax revenueSales taxDebt
Sheridan LakeUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 23.2% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,012$222$111Not reported for this year$185
VilasUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 16.2% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,689$1,519$255$3,415
VonaUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 53.4% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$689Not reported for this year$623
HaswellUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 69.2% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$582$373Not reported for this year$552
Two ButtesUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 23.7% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$950$100Not reported for this year$175
Peer median$819$1,519Benchmark unavailableNot reported for this year$587

Utilities marks a municipality whose revenue and spending include city-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit), which raises its per-resident totals.

Sources

Book a walkthrough