Orivian

Silt · FY2016 municipal finance benchmarks

Garfield County · Western Slope · home rule municipality · Pop. 3,743 (2025 estimate); FY2016 per-resident figures use 3,039 · Census finance data FY2016, FY2021, FY2023

You’re viewing FY2016. See the latest view (FY2023). Latest Census Bureau finance data for Silt: FY2023. Retrieved Oct 2026. Newer years are added when the Census Bureau publishes them. Why the lag?

FY2016 in brief

Silt collected $1,095 per resident (including city-run utilities), 37% below the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year, 13% below its peers. Tax revenue per resident sits 22% below its peers, and 42% below the state median. Debt per resident runs 84% below peers.

Generated from the figures below. Every number links to its Census source.

Compared with

Nearest on population, household income and region

FY2016 headline figures

Revenue per resident (definition)

$1,095
13% below peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$1,262
CO median · 224 with a published figure
$1,746
Position
Higher than 29% of the 224 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Expenditures per resident (definition)

$1,313
14% below peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$1,526
CO median · 196 with a published figure
$1,749
Position
Higher than 33% of the 196 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Tax revenue per resident (definition)

$408
22% below peers
Peer median
$522
CO median · 193 with a published figure
$705
Position
Higher than 31% of the 193 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Debt per resident (definition)

$180
84% below peers
Peer median
$1,139
CO median · 220 with a published figure
$1,072
Position
Higher than 16% of the 220 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Where the money comes from and where it goes

Per resident, FY2016. Bars show Silt; the gold tick is the peer median. How categories work

The biggest difference from peers is Public safety: $207 per resident, 53% below the peer median. On the revenue side, intergovernmental is 79% below peers.

Money in

Revenue

$1,095
per resident13% below peers
Money in: Silt revenue per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$50066% abovepeers $302
$30521% belowpeers $385
$8932% belowpeers $131
$8779% belowpeers $413
$6637% belowpeers $105
$3680% abovepeers $20
$1085% belowpeers $70
Peer median of 5 peers · Colorado median of 224 reporting

Money out

Spending

$1,313
per resident14% below peers
Money out: Silt spending per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$47421% belowpeers $598
$27741% abovepeers $197
$271in line withpeers $263
$20753% belowpeers $436
$7716% belowpeers $92
$726% belowpeers $10
Peer median of 5 peers · Colorado median of 196 reporting

Silt and its peers

The five Colorado municipalities nearest on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn’t a matching factor, so peers aren’t chosen on the figures being compared. Per resident, FY2016. How peers are chosen

Open in Compare
Silt compared with its peer municipalities, FY2016, per resident
MunicipalityRevenueExpendituresTax revenueSales taxDebt
SiltUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 45.7% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,095$1,313$408$305$180
Orchard CityUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 32.0% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$942$888Not reported for this yearNot reported for this year
Snowmass VillageRegional hub: Sales tax per resident is 7.5× the Colorado median.$11,120$9,763$4,175$3,312
MeekerUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 21.8% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,262$1,526$522$422Not reported for this year
FriscoUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 5.7% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.Regional hub: Sales tax per resident is 2.6× the Colorado median.$6,224$5,341$2,451$1,422$1,139
PalisadeUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 42.5% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,156$874$492$348$171
Peer median$1,262$1,526$522$922$1,139

Utilities marks a municipality whose revenue and spending include city-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit), which raises its per-resident totals.

Regional hub marks a municipality whose sales tax per resident is at least 1.5× the Colorado median: a shopping or visitor hub where people who live elsewhere pay much of the sales tax.

Sources

Book a walkthrough