Orivian

Vona · FY2016 municipal finance benchmarks

Kit Carson County · Eastern Plains · statutory town · Pop. 89 (2025 estimate); FY2016 per-resident figures use 106 · Census finance data FY2016, FY2021

You’re viewing FY2016. See the latest view (FY2021). Latest Census Bureau finance data for Vona: FY2021. Retrieved Oct 2026. Newer years are added when the Census Bureau publishes them. Why the lag?

FY2016 in brief

Vona collected $689 per resident (including city-run utilities), 61% below the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year, 41% below its peers. Debt per resident runs 74% below peers.

  • Tax revenue per resident withheld: Tax revenue per resident is 29% of the peer median

Generated from the figures below. Every number links to its Census source.

Compared with

Nearest on population, household income and region

FY2016 headline figures

Revenue per resident (definition)

$689
41% below peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$1,161
CO median · 224 with a published figure
$1,746
Position
Higher than 8% of the 224 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Expenditures per resident (definition)

Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
Benchmark unavailable
CO median · 196 with a published figure
$1,749
Position
Not reported for this year
5-year changenominal dollars
Withheld with this year's value

Tax revenue per resident (definition)

Peer median
Benchmark unavailable
CO median · 193 with a published figure
$705
Position
Not reported for this year
5-year changenominal dollars
Withheld with this year's value

Debt per resident (definition)

$623
74% below peers
Peer median
$2,377
CO median · 220 with a published figure
$1,072
Position
Higher than 35% of the 220 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Where the money comes from and where it goes

Per resident, FY2016. Bars show Vona; the gold tick is the peer median. How categories work

On the revenue side, the biggest difference from peers is Intergovernmental: $94 per resident, 76% below the peer median.

Money in

Revenue

$689
per resident41% below peers
Money in: Vona revenue per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$36841% abovepeers $261
$15158% belowpeers $359
$9476% belowpeers $396
$1975% belowpeers $75
None reported · peers $9$0None reported
Withheldpeers $138
Peer median of 4 peers · Colorado median of 224 reporting

Money out

Spending

Categories are withheld with the total until it is verified against Vona’s audited financial report.

Peer median of 4 peers · Colorado median of 196 reporting

Vona and its peers

The five Colorado municipalities nearest on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn’t a matching factor, so peers aren’t chosen on the figures being compared. Per resident, FY2016. How peers are chosen

Open in Compare
Vona compared with its peer municipalities, FY2016, per resident
MunicipalityRevenueExpendituresTax revenueSales taxDebt
VonaUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 53.4% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$689Not reported for this year$623
VilasUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 16.2% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,689$1,519$255$3,415
CrookUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 22.7% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,092$1,009$193Not reported for this yearNot reported for this year
GenoaUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 23.2% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$958$111Not reported for this year$181
PritchettUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 25.0% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,231$746$200Not reported for this year$2,377
Peer median$1,161Benchmark unavailableBenchmark unavailableNot reported for this year$2,377

Utilities marks a municipality whose revenue and spending include city-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit), which raises its per-resident totals.

Sources

Book a walkthrough