Orivian

Peetz · FY2016 municipal finance benchmarks

Logan County · Eastern Plains · statutory town · Pop. 202 (2025 estimate); FY2016 per-resident figures use 240 · Census finance data FY2016, FY2021

Latest Census Bureau finance data for Peetz: FY2021. Retrieved Oct 2026. Newer years are added when the Census Bureau publishes them. Why the lag?

FY2016 in brief

Peetz collected $646 per resident (including city-run utilities), 63% below the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year, 34% below its peers. Tax revenue per resident sits 73% above its peers, but 75% below the state median.

Generated from the figures below. Every number links to its Census source.

Compared with

Nearest on population, household income and region

FY2016 headline figures

Revenue per resident (definition)

$646
34% below peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$977
CO median · 224 with a published figure
$1,746
Position
Higher than 7% of the 224 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Expenditures per resident (definition)

$1,079
12% above peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$965
CO median · 196 with a published figure
$1,749
Position
Higher than 25% of the 196 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Tax revenue per resident (definition)

$179
73% above peers
Peer median
$103
CO median · 193 with a published figure
$705
Position
Higher than 13% of the 193 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Where the money comes from and where it goes

Per resident, FY2016. Bars show Peetz; the gold tick is the peer median. How categories work

The biggest difference from peers is General government: $654 per resident, 3.5× the peer median. On the revenue side, fees & charges is 38% below peers.

Money in

Revenue

$646
per resident34% below peers
Money in: Peetz revenue per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$22938% belowpeers $370
$18323% belowpeers $238
$12136% abovepeers $89
$5830.0×peers $2
$5029% belowpeers $70
$495% belowpeers $77
Peer median of 5 peers · Colorado median of 224 reporting

Money out

Spending

$1,079
per resident12% above peers
Money out: Peetz spending per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$6543.5×peers $188
$36752% belowpeers $763
$5029% belowpeers $70
$857% belowpeers $19
None reported · peers $71$0None reported
None reported · peers $23$0None reported
Peer median of 3 peers · Colorado median of 196 reporting

Peetz and its peers

The five Colorado municipalities nearest on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn’t a matching factor, so peers aren’t chosen on the figures being compared. Per resident, FY2016. How peers are chosen

Open in Compare
Peetz compared with its peer municipalities, FY2016, per resident
MunicipalityRevenueExpendituresTax revenueSales taxDebt
PeetzUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 28.4% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$646$1,079$179Not reported for this yearNot reported for this year
Sugar CityUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 23.0% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$935$106Not reported for this year$175
CherawUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 11.6% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$386$53Not reported for this yearNot reported for this year
HillroseUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 47.1% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,066$965$101Not reported for this year$2,630
EckleyUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 24.4% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$977$823$115Not reported for this year$342
Kit CarsonUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 27.6% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.Regional hub: Sales tax per resident is 2.6× the Colorado median.$3,988$3,938$1,433$1,604
Peer median$977$965$103Not reported for this yearNot reported for this year

Utilities marks a municipality whose revenue and spending include city-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit), which raises its per-resident totals.

Regional hub marks a municipality whose sales tax per resident is at least 1.5× the Colorado median: a shopping or visitor hub where people who live elsewhere pay much of the sales tax.

Sources

Book a walkthrough