Orivian

Sugar City · FY2016 municipal finance benchmarks

Crowley County · Eastern Plains · statutory town · Pop. 238 (2025 estimate); FY2016 per-resident figures use 246 · Census finance data FY2016

Latest Census Bureau finance data for Sugar City: FY2016. Retrieved Oct 2026. Newer years are added when the Census Bureau publishes them. Why the lag?

Compare

FY2016 in brief

Sugar City collected $935 per resident (including city-run utilities), 46% below the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year, 15% above its peers. Tax revenue per resident sits in line with its peers, but 85% below the state median. Debt per resident runs 88% below peers.

Generated from the figures below. Every number links to its Census source.

Compared with

Nearest on population, household income and region

FY2016 headline figures

Revenue per resident (definition)

$935
15% above peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$811
CO median · 224 with a published figure
$1,746
Position
Higher than 17% of the 224 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change
How Colorado compares on revenue per resident

Expenditures per resident (definition)

Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
Benchmark unavailable
CO median · 196 with a published figure
$1,749
Position
Not reported for this year
5-year changenominal dollars
Withheld with this year's value

Tax revenue per resident (definition)

$106
in line with peers
Peer median
$101
CO median · 193 with a published figure
$705
Position
Higher than 7% of the 193 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Debt per resident (definition)

$175
88% below peers
Peer median
$1,487
CO median · 220 with a published figure
$1,072
Position
Higher than 11% of the 220 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change
How Colorado compares on debt per resident

How this number was calculated

Revenue per resident · $935
Includes Census estimates for 100% of revenue

  1. 1Metric

    $935 Total revenue divided by population

    = Total revenue ÷ population

    Full definition: Revenue per resident

  2. 2Inputs

    Total revenue $230K ÷ population 246 (2016 estimate)

  3. 3Census line items

    • A80 Sewer charges
    • A81 Solid waste charges
    • A89 General government (other) charges
    • A91 Water utility charges
    • T01 Property tax
    • U11 Sale of property
    • U99 Miscellaneous

  4. 4Source file

What the numbers mean

  • Sugar City runs city-owned utilities, which add 23.0% of its revenue. Cities that don't run utilities will look lower on revenue and spending per resident for that reason alone. What counts as utility revenue
  • With about 246 residents, small changes in Sugar City's budget move per-resident figures a lot. Compare several years, not one.
  • Part of Sugar City's FY2016 revenue is a Census Bureau estimate, not a reported figure. How estimates are handled

Where the money comes from and where it goes

Per resident, FY2016. Bars show Sugar City; the gold tick is the peer median. How categories work

On the revenue side, the biggest difference from peers is Fees & charges: $451 per resident, 66% above the peer median.

Money in

Revenue

$935
per resident15% above peers
Money in: Sugar City revenue per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$45166% abovepeers $272
$215in line withpeers $211
$16311.8×peers $14
$10619% abovepeers $89
None reported · peers $60$0None reported
None reported · peers $19$0None reported
Peer median of 4 peers · Colorado median of 224 reporting

Money out

Spending

Categories are withheld with the total until it is verified against Sugar City’s audited financial report.

Peer median of 3 peers · Colorado median of 196 reporting

Sugar City and its peers

The five Colorado municipalities nearest on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn’t a matching factor, so peers aren’t chosen on the figures being compared. Per resident, FY2016. How peers are chosen

Open in Compare
Sugar City compared with its peer municipalities, FY2016, per resident
MunicipalityRevenueExpendituresTax revenueSales taxDebt
Sugar CityUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 23.0% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$935$106Not reported for this year$175
CherawUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 11.6% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$386$53Not reported for this yearNot reported for this year
PeetzUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 28.4% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$646$1,079$179Not reported for this yearNot reported for this year
HillroseUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 47.1% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,066$965$101Not reported for this year$2,630
EckleyUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 24.4% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$977$823$115Not reported for this year$342
Peer median$811Benchmark unavailable$101Not reported for this year$1,487

Utilities marks a municipality whose revenue and spending include city-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit), which raises its per-resident totals.

Trends

Every available fiscal year. Lines break where a year is missing or withheld; nothing is interpolated.

  • This city
  • Peer median
  • Withheld (shown on the axis, no value)
  • Colorado median (Census of Governments years only)
Revenue per resident
FY2016 $935.$0$873$1.7K’16Peer median FY2016: $811Colorado median FY2016: $1,746 (all 224 municipalities reporting)FY2016: $935

Fiscal year · nominal dollars, not adjusted for inflation

Show data table
Revenue per resident by fiscal year
YearThis cityPeer medianColorado median
FY2016$935$811$1,746 (224 reporting)
Tax revenue per resident
FY2016 $106.$0$352.6$705.1’16Peer median FY2016: $101Colorado median FY2016: $705 (all 224 municipalities reporting)FY2016: $106

Fiscal year · nominal dollars, not adjusted for inflation

Show data table
Tax revenue per resident by fiscal year
YearThis cityPeer medianColorado median
FY2016$106$101$705 (193 reporting)
Debt per resident
FY2016 $175.$0$743.5$1.5K’16Peer median FY2016: $1,487Colorado median FY2016: $1,072 (all 224 municipalities reporting)FY2016: $175

Fiscal year · nominal dollars, not adjusted for inflation

Show data table
Debt per resident by fiscal year
YearThis cityPeer medianColorado median
FY2016$175$1,487$1,072 (220 reporting)

Questions about Sugar City’s finances

How much revenue does Sugar City collect per resident?
Sugar City collected $935 per resident in FY2016, 46% below the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year. See the figure
How much debt does Sugar City have per resident?
Sugar City carried $175 of debt per resident in FY2016, 88% below its peers' median. See the figure
Which cities is Sugar City compared with?
Sugar City is compared with Cheraw, Peetz, Hillrose and Eckley: the Colorado municipalities nearest to it on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn't used, so peers aren't chosen on the figures being compared. See the peer table
Where do these numbers come from?
From the U.S. Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, as each government reported its own fiscal year, divided by Census population estimates. Figures that fail quality checks are withheld rather than shown. Sources and methodology

Community context

American Community Survey 5-year estimates and Census population estimates. Where the selected year isn’t available, the nearest earlier year is shown and labeled.

Population growth (5-yr)
−1.4%/yr
2016 estimate
Median household income
Not reported for this year
Poverty rate
Not reported for this year
Median home value
Not reported for this year
Housing vacancy rate
Not reported for this year

Explore further

Also in Eastern Plains

Revenue per resident, latest published year.

Sources

Dataset: Sugar City, CO municipal finance benchmarks

Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (opens in a new tab). Please credit “Source: Orivian Municipal Index, orivian.ai/benchmarks”. See the data use terms.

Notes: dollars are nominal (not inflation-adjusted). Colorado medians cover the municipalities reporting that year. Peers: nearest on population, income and region. Definitions: orivian.ai/benchmarks/methodology.Retrieved October 12, 2026 from orivian.ai/benchmarks.

Every figure on this page is read from the published index; nothing is recalculated for display. Read the methodology

Work for Sugar City? See this kind of answer for your monthly numbers.

Orivian applies the same sourced, governed approach to your city's own budget-vs-actual data.

See how it worksTalk to us
Book a walkthrough