Orivian

Eckley · FY2016 municipal finance benchmarks

Yuma County · Eastern Plains · statutory town · Pop. 232 (2025 estimate); FY2016 per-resident figures use 260 · Census finance data FY2016, FY2023

You’re viewing FY2016. See the latest view (FY2023). Latest Census Bureau finance data for Eckley: FY2023. Retrieved Oct 2026. Newer years are added when the Census Bureau publishes them. Why the lag?

FY2016 in brief

Eckley collected $977 per resident (including city-run utilities), 44% below the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year, 24% above its peers. Tax revenue per resident sits 14% above its peers, but 84% below the state median. Debt per resident runs 77% below peers.

Generated from the figures below. Every number links to its Census source.

Compared with

Nearest on population, household income and region

FY2016 headline figures

Revenue per resident (definition)

$977
24% above peers
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
$790
CO median · 224 with a published figure
$1,746
Position
Higher than 23% of the 224 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Expenditures per resident (definition)

$823
53% below CO median
Includes city-owned utilities
Peer median
Benchmark unavailable
CO median · 196 with a published figure
$1,749
Position
Higher than 17% of the 196 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Tax revenue per resident (definition)

$115
14% above peers
Peer median
$101
CO median · 193 with a published figure
$705
Position
Higher than 10% of the 193 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Debt per resident (definition)

$342
77% below peers
Peer median
$1,487
CO median · 220 with a published figure
$1,072
Position
Higher than 25% of the 220 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Where the money comes from and where it goes

Per resident, FY2016. Bars show Eckley; the gold tick is the peer median. How categories work

On the revenue side, the biggest difference from peers is Intergovernmental: $250 per resident, 5.5× the peer median.

Money in

Revenue

$977
per resident24% above peers
Money in: Eckley revenue per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$296in line withpeers $309
$2505.5×peers $45
$23820% abovepeers $199
$8120% belowpeers $101
$775.6×peers $14
$3517.8×peers $2
Peer median of 4 peers · Colorado median of 224 reporting

Money out

Spending

$823
per resident
Money out: Eckley spending per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
Peer median unavailable$515No peer comparison
Peer median unavailable$188No peer comparison
Peer median unavailable$81No peer comparison
Peer median unavailable$23No peer comparison
Peer median unavailable$8No peer comparison
Peer median unavailable$8No peer comparison
Peer median of 2 peers · Colorado median of 196 reporting

Eckley and its peers

The five Colorado municipalities nearest on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn’t a matching factor, so peers aren’t chosen on the figures being compared. Per resident, FY2016. How peers are chosen

Open in Compare
Eckley compared with its peer municipalities, FY2016, per resident
MunicipalityRevenueExpendituresTax revenueSales taxDebt
EckleyUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 24.4% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$977$823$115Not reported for this year$342
CherawUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 11.6% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$386$53Not reported for this yearNot reported for this year
Sugar CityUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 23.0% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$935$106Not reported for this year$175
HillroseUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 47.1% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,066$965$101Not reported for this year$2,630
PeetzUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 28.4% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$646$1,079$179Not reported for this yearNot reported for this year
Peer median$790Benchmark unavailable$101Not reported for this year$1,487

Utilities marks a municipality whose revenue and spending include city-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit), which raises its per-resident totals.

Sources

Book a walkthrough