Orivian

Foxfield · FY2016 municipal finance benchmarks

Arapahoe County · Denver Metro · statutory town · Pop. 746 (2025 estimate); FY2016 per-resident figures use 778 · Census finance data FY2016, FY2021

You’re viewing FY2016. See the latest view (FY2021). Latest Census Bureau finance data for Foxfield: FY2021. Retrieved Oct 2026. Newer years are added when the Census Bureau publishes them. Why the lag?

FY2016 in brief

Foxfield collected $994 per resident, 43% below the median of the 224 Colorado municipalities reporting that year, 18% below its peers. Tax revenue per resident sits 10% above its peers, but 24% below the state median. Debt per resident runs 39% below peers.

Generated from the figures below. Every number links to its Census source.

Compared with

Nearest on population, household income and region

FY2016 headline figures

Revenue per resident (definition)

$994
18% below peers
Peer median
$1,214
CO median · 224 with a published figure
$1,746
Position
Higher than 24% of the 224 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Expenditures per resident (definition)

$715
29% below peers
Peer median
$1,008
CO median · 196 with a published figure
$1,749
Position
Higher than 13% of the 196 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Tax revenue per resident (definition)

$536
10% above peers
Peer median
$489
CO median · 193 with a published figure
$705
Position
Higher than 41% of the 193 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Debt per resident (definition)

$321
39% below peers
Peer median
$524
CO median · 220 with a published figure
$1,072
Position
Higher than 24% of the 220 reporting
5-year changenominal dollars
Not enough history for a 5-year change

Where the money comes from and where it goes

Per resident, FY2016. Bars show Foxfield; the gold tick is the peer median. How categories work

The biggest difference from peers is General government: $563 per resident, 3.8× the peer median. On the revenue side, other revenue is 13.6× peers.

Money in

Revenue

$994
per resident18% below peers
Money in: Foxfield revenue per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
Peer median unavailable$386No peer comparison
$38413.6×peers $28
$11170% belowpeers $364
$4943% belowpeers $86
$4038% belowpeers $64
$24No peer comparisonpeers $0
Peer median of 4 peers · Colorado median of 224 reporting

Money out

Spending

$715
per resident29% below peers
Money out: Foxfield spending per resident by category, FY2016, against the peer median. Open a category for its lines and Census item codes.
CategoryPer residentvs peers
$5633.8×peers $148
$12656% belowpeers $289
$262.6×peers $10
None reported · peers $195$0None reported
None reported · peers $41$0None reported
Peer median of 4 peers · Colorado median of 196 reporting

Foxfield and its peers

The five Colorado municipalities nearest on population, median household income and region. Budget size isn’t a matching factor, so peers aren’t chosen on the figures being compared. Per resident, FY2016. How peers are chosen

Open in Compare
Foxfield compared with its peer municipalities, FY2016, per resident
MunicipalityRevenueExpendituresTax revenueSales taxDebt
Foxfield$994$715$536$386$321
Timnath$3,675$2,925$657
Bow Mar$1,153$822$1,046Not reported for this year$66
Columbine Valley$582$667$489Not reported for this year
CalhanUtilities: City-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit) brought in 45.9% of total revenue in FY2016. Revenue and spending per resident include them, so cities that run their own utilities read higher than cities that don't.$1,275$1,194$404$223$390
Peer median$1,214$1,008$489Benchmark unavailable$524

Utilities marks a municipality whose revenue and spending include city-owned utilities (water, electric, gas, transit), which raises its per-resident totals.

Sources

Book a walkthrough